Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TYD vs UST: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TYD finished 2.5 points short and UST 0.8 points short.

Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−9.6%TYD returned, 3 months
−5.5%UST returned, 3 months
−2.5 ptsTYD from its stated multiple
−0.8 ptsUST from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: UST scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TYD 51.3UST 97.80.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TYD2.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IEF −2.4% ×3 implies−7.1%TYD returned−9.6%IEF −2.4% ×3 implies−7.1%TYD returned−9.6%
UST0.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IEF −2.4% ×2 implies−4.7%UST returned−5.5%IEF −2.4% ×2 implies−4.7%UST returned−5.5%

Performance, window by window

TYD and UST over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TYDUSTTYDUSTTYDUST
1 month−6.1%−3.8%−5.2%−3.5%−0.8 pts−0.3 pts
3 months−9.6%−5.5%−7.1%−4.7%−2.5 pts−0.8 pts
6 months−13.1%−7.4%−8.5%−5.7%−4.6 pts−1.7 pts
1 year−17.5%−9.1%−8.2%−5.4%−9.4 pts−3.7 pts
3 years−10.9%+1.4%+26.3%+17.5%−37.2 pts−16.1 pts
Since launch+39.3%+42.0%+149.8%+94.1%−110.5 pts−52.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TYD and UST on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TYD
Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
Aims to return three times the daily move of 10-year Treasuries (IEF)
UST
ProShares Ultra 7-10 Year Treasury
Aims to return twice the daily move of 10-year Treasuries (IEF)
IssuerDirexionProShares
Sets out to return+3x+2x
OnIEFIEF
Segmentbondbond
Fund returned, 3 months−9.6%−5.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months−2.4%−2.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−7.1%−4.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.5 pts−0.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−17.5%−9.1%
Difference from stated, over that window−9.4 pts−3.7 pts
Underlying volatility5%5%
Expense ratio1.07%0.95%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Feb 2, 2010

TYD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TYD returned −9.6% where its own daily promise gave −7.1%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times IEF's −2.4% implies −7.1%, which makes TYD look 2.5 points short. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TYD aims to return +3 times IEF's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IEF moved at 5% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UST in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UST returned −5.5% where its own daily promise gave −4.7%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times IEF's −2.4% implies −4.7%, which makes UST look 0.8 points short. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UST aims to return +2 times IEF's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TYD or UST?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TYD finished 2.5 points from what its multiple implies and UST finished 0.8 points from its own, so UST came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TYD and UST levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on 10-year Treasuries, TYD at +3 times and UST at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TYD or UST?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TYD’s moved at 5% annualized and UST’s at 5%, so TYD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TYD or UST for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TYD or UST?
TYD charges 1.07% a year and UST charges 0.95%, so UST is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TYD against UST, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TYD against UST, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TYD-UST Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources