Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSMU vs TWSC: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TSMU finished 2.0 points from its stated multiple and TWSC 1.4.

GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF and Corgi TSM 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−4.2%TSMU returned, 3 months
−22.1%TWSC returned, 3 months
−8.6 ptsTSMU from its stated multiple
−3.5 ptsTWSC from its stated multiple
TSMU8.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSM +2.2% ×2 implies+4.4%TSMU returned−4.2%TSM +2.2% ×2 implies+4.4%TSMU returned−4.2%
TWSC1.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
TSM +0.9% ×2 implies+1.9%TWSC returned+0.6%TSM +0.9% ×2 implies+1.9%TWSC returned+0.6%

Performance, window by window

TSMU and TWSC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSMUTWSCTSMUTWSCTSMUTWSC
1 month−0.1%+0.6%+1.9%+1.9%−2.0 pts−1.4 pts
3 months−4.2%not published+4.4%not published−8.6 ptsnot published
6 months+39.0%not published+57.4%not published−18.4 ptsnot published
1 year+107.1%not published+138.3%not published−31.1 ptsnot published
Since launch+191.7%−22.1%not meaningful−18.6%not meaningful−3.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSMU and TWSC on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSMU
GraniteShares 2x Long TSM Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of TSM
TWSC
Corgi TSM 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of TSM
IssuerGraniteSharesCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnTSMTSM
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−4.2%+0.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months+2.2%+0.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+4.4%+1.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−8.6 pts−1.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+107.1%−22.1%
Difference from stated, over that window−31.1 pts−3.5 pts
Underlying volatility45%26%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.0 pts−1.4 pts
Expense ratio1.50%0.45%
LaunchedNov 12, 2024Jun 30, 2026

TSMU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSMU returned −4.2% where its own daily promise gave −0.5%, 3.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSM's 2.2% implies +4.4%, which makes TSMU look 8.6 points short. 4.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSMU aims to return +2 times TSM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSM moved at 45% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TWSC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: TWSC returned +0.6% where its own daily promise gave +1.3%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSM's 0.9% implies +1.9%, which makes TWSC look 1.4 points short. 0.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TWSC aims to return +2 times TSM's move each day, then resets. TSM moved at 26% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSMU or TWSC?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSMU finished 8.6 points from what its multiple implies and TWSC finished 1.4 points from its own, so TWSC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSMU and TWSC levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on TSM, TSMU at +2 times and TWSC at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSMU or TWSC?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSMU’s moved at 45% annualized and TWSC’s at 26%, so TSMU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSMU or TWSC for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSMU or TWSC?
TSMU charges 1.50% a year and TWSC charges 0.45%, so TWSC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSMU against TWSC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSMU against TWSC, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSMU-TWSC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources