Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSL vs TSLT: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSL finished 0.8 points short and TSLT 2.5 points short.

GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−14.3%TSL returned, 3 months
−28.3%TSLT returned, 3 months
−1.7 ptsTSL from its stated multiple
−8.1 ptsTSLT from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSL 97.6TSLT 50.50.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TSL1.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×1.25 implies−12.6%TSL returned−14.3%TSLA −10.1% ×1.25 implies−12.6%TSL returned−14.3%
TSLT8.1 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLT returned−28.3%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLT returned−28.3%

Performance, window by window

TSL and TSLT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSLTSLTTSLTSLTTSLTSLT
1 month+13.9%+20.4%+14.5%+23.2%−0.6 pts−2.8 pts
3 months−14.3%−28.3%−12.6%−20.2%−1.7 pts−8.1 pts
6 months−11.5%−29.3%−8.2%−13.2%−3.3 pts−16.1 pts
1 year−7.9%−32.7%−1.1%−1.8%−6.7 pts−30.9 pts
3 years+9.3%not published+45.8%not published−36.5 ptsnot published
Since launch−11.4%−33.9%+36.2%+132.1%−47.7 pts−166.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSL and TSLT on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF
Aims to return 1.25 times the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLT
T-REX 2X LONG TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerGraniteSharesT-REX
Sets out to return+1.25x+2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−14.3%−28.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months−10.1%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−12.6%−20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.7 pts−8.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−7.9%−32.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−6.7 pts−30.9 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−2.8 pts
Expense ratio1.15%1.05%
LaunchedAug 9, 2022Oct 19, 2023

TSL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSL returned −14.3% where its own daily promise gave −13.6%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +1.25 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −12.6%, which makes TSL look 1.7 points short. 1.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +1.25 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSL aims to return +1.25 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +1.25 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLT in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLT returned −28.3% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLT look 8.1 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLT aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSL or TSLT?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSL finished 1.7 points from what its multiple implies and TSLT finished 8.1 points from its own, so TSL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSL and TSLT levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSL at +1.25 times and TSLT at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSL or TSLT?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSL’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLT’s at 56%, so TSL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSL or TSLT for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSL or TSLT?
TSL charges 1.15% a year and TSLT charges 1.05%, so TSLT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSL against TSLT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSL against TSLT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSL-TSLT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources