Which came closer to its stated multiple, TEMC or TEMT?

Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TEMC finished 9.0 points from what its multiple implies and TEMT finished 22.7 points from its own, so TEMC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are TEMC and TEMT levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on TEM, TEMC at +2 times and TEMT at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, TEMC or TEMT?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TEMC’s moved at 111% annualized and TEMT’s at 89%, so TEMC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold TEMC or TEMT for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of Sep 11, 2026.

TEMC vs TEMT: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TEMC finished 9.0 points from its stated multiple and TEMT 9.8.

Corgi TEM 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−11.7%TEMC returned, 3 months

+24.1%TEMT returned, 3 months

−14.4 ptsTEMC from its stated multiple

−22.7 ptsTEMT from its stated multiple

TEMC9 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026

TEMT22.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026

Performance, window by window

TEMC and TEMT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
Window	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	TEMC	TEMT	TEMC	TEMT	TEMC	TEMT
1 month	+7.1%	+6.3%	+16.1%	+16.1%	−9.0 pts	−9.8 pts
3 months	not published	+24.1%	not published	+46.8%	not published	−22.7 pts
6 months	not published	−3.7%	not published	+36.1%	not published	−39.9 pts
1 year	not published	−76.2%	not published	−67.1%	not published	−9.1 pts
Since launch	−11.7%	−69.8%	+2.7%	−28.7%	−14.4 pts	−41.0 pts

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

TEMC and TEMT on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	TEMC Corgi TEM 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of TEM	TEMT Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of TEM
Issuer	Corgi	Tradr
Sets out to return	+2x	+2x
On	TEM	TEM
Segment	company	company
Fund returned, 3 months	+7.1%	+24.1%
Underlying returned, 3 months	+8.1%	+23.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months	+16.1%	+46.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months	−9.0 pts	−22.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch	−11.7%	−76.2%
Difference from stated, over that window	−14.4 pts	−9.1 pts
Underlying volatility	111%	89%
Difference over the days both have traded	−9.0 pts	−9.8 pts
Expense ratio	not published	1.31%
Launched	Jul 10, 2026	May 13, 2025

TEMC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: TEMC returned +7.1% where its own daily promise gave +7.2%, 0.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TEM's 8.1% implies +16.1%, which makes TEMC look 9.0 points short. 8.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TEMC aims to return +2 times TEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TEM moved at 111% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TEMT in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TEMT returned +24.1% where its own daily promise gave +27.9%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TEM's 23.4% implies +46.8%, which makes TEMT look 22.7 points short. 18.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TEMT aims to return +2 times TEM's move each day, then resets. TEM moved at 89% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TEMC or TEMT?: Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TEMC finished 9.0 points from what its multiple implies and TEMT finished 22.7 points from its own, so TEMC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TEMC and TEMT levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on TEM, TEMC at +2 times and TEMT at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TEMC or TEMT?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TEMC’s moved at 111% annualized and TEMT’s at 89%, so TEMC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TEMC or TEMT for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TEMC against TEMT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TEMC against TEMT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TEMC-TEMT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources