Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TBF vs TTT: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TBF finished 1.5 points over and TTT 3.2 points over.

ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury and ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+6.1%TBF returned, 3 months
+16.9%TTT returned, 3 months
+1.5 ptsTBF from its stated multiple
+3.1 ptsTTT from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TTT scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TBF 47.5TTT 87.60.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TBF1.5 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TLT −4.6% ×1 implies+4.6%TBF returned+6.1%TLT −4.6% ×1 implies+4.6%TBF returned+6.1%
TTT3.1 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TLT −4.6% ×3 implies+13.9%TTT returned+16.9%TLT −4.6% ×3 implies+13.9%TTT returned+16.9%

Performance, window by window

TBF and TTT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TBFTTTTBFTTTTBFTTT
1 month+1.5%+4.1%+1.1%+3.4%+0.4 pts+0.7 pts
3 months+6.1%+16.9%+4.6%+13.9%+1.5 pts+3.1 pts
6 months+7.3%+18.3%+4.4%+13.1%+2.9 pts+5.2 pts
1 year+12.5%+31.4%+6.4%+19.1%+6.1 pts+12.2 pts
3 years+21.6%+23.0%+2.6%+7.7%+19.1 pts+15.3 pts
Since launch−39.6%−72.8%−47.2%−19.3%+7.6 pts−53.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TBF and TTT on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TBF
ProShares Short 20+ Year Treasury
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of 20-year Treasuries (TLT)
TTT
ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of 20-year Treasuries (TLT)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-1x-3x
OnTLTTLT
Segmentbondbond
Fund returned, 3 months+6.1%+16.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months−4.6%−4.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+4.6%+13.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.5 pts+3.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+12.5%+31.4%
Difference from stated, over that window+6.1 pts+12.2 pts
Underlying volatility9%9%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window+3.1 pts
Expense rationot published0.95%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Mar 29, 2012

TBF in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TBF returned +6.1% where its own daily promise gave +4.6%, 1.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times TLT's −4.6% implies +4.6%, which makes TBF look 1.5 points over. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TBF aims to return -1 times TLT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TLT moved at 9% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TTT in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TTT returned +16.9% where its own daily promise gave +13.7%, 3.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times TLT's −4.6% implies +13.9%, which makes TTT look 3.1 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TTT aims to return -3 times TLT's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TBF or TTT?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TBF finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and TTT finished 3.1 points from its own, so TBF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TBF and TTT levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on 20-year Treasuries, TBF at -1 times and TTT at -3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TBF or TTT?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TBF’s moved at 9% annualized and TTT’s at 9%, so TBF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TBF or TTT for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TBF against TTT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TBF against TTT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TBF-TTT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources