Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SPCU vs SSPC: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, SPCU finished 2.0 points short and SSPC 0.1 points over.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long [SpaceX] ETF and Leverage Shares 2X Short SPCX Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−51.0%SPCU returned, 3 months
−1.4%SSPC returned, 3 months
−8.1 ptsSPCU from its stated multiple
−44.3 ptsSSPC from its stated multiple
SPCU3.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCU returned+3.5%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPCU returned+3.5%
SSPC3.8 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SSPC returned−10.7%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%SSPC returned−10.7%

Performance, window by window

SPCU and SSPC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SPCUSSPCSPCUSSPCSPCUSSPC
1 month+3.5%−10.7%+6.9%−6.9%−3.4 pts−3.8 pts
Since launch−51.0%−1.4%−42.9%+42.9%−8.1 pts−44.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SPCU and SSPC on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPCU
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long [SpaceX] ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SSPC
Leverage Shares 2X Short SPCX Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
IssuerDefianceLeverage Shares
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnSPCXSPCX
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+3.5%−10.7%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.5%+3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+6.9%−6.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−3.4 pts−3.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−51.0%−1.4%
Difference from stated, over that window−8.1 pts−44.3 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded−3.4 pts−3.8 pts
Expense ratio1.31%not published
LaunchedJun 15, 2026Jun 15, 2026

SPCU in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCU returned +3.5% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies +6.9%, which makes SPCU look 3.4 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCU aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SSPC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SSPC returned −10.7% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SSPC look 3.8 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SSPC aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPCU or SSPC?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SPCU finished 3.4 points from what its multiple implies and SSPC finished 3.8 points from its own, so SPCU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SPCU and SSPC levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPCU at +2 times and SSPC at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SPCU or SSPC?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPCU’s moved at 43% annualized and SSPC’s at 43%, so SPCU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SPCU or SSPC for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPCU against SSPC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPCU against SSPC, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SPCU-SSPC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources