Data as of .
SPCG vs SPCQ: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, SPCG finished 3.5 points from its stated multiple and SPCQ 3.6.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPCG | SPCQ | SPCG | SPCQ | SPCG | SPCQ | |
| 1 month | −10.4% | −10.5% | −6.9% | −6.9% | −3.5 pts | −3.6 pts |
| Since launch | +0.5% | −8.8% | +42.9% | +42.9% | −42.4 pts | −51.7 pts |
| SPCG Tradr 2X Short SpaceX Daily ETF Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) | SPCQ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short [SpaceX] ETF Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Tradr | Defiance |
| Sets out to return | -2x | -2x |
| On | SPCX | SPCX |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −10.4% | −10.5% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +3.5% | +3.5% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −6.9% | −6.9% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −3.5 pts | −3.6 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | +0.5% | −8.8% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −42.4 pts | −51.7 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 43% | 43% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −3.5 pts | −3.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 1.49% | 1.31% |
| Launched | Jun 15, 2026 | Jun 15, 2026 |
SPCG in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCG returned −10.4% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SPCG look 3.5 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCG aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
SPCQ in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPCQ returned −10.5% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 0.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes SPCQ look 3.6 points short. SPCQ aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPCG or SPCQ?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SPCG finished 3.5 points from what its multiple implies and SPCQ finished 3.6 points from its own, so SPCG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are SPCG and SPCQ levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPCG at -2 times and SPCQ at -2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, SPCG or SPCQ?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPCG’s moved at 43% annualized and SPCQ’s at 43%, so SPCG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold SPCG or SPCQ for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, SPCG or SPCQ?
- SPCG charges 1.49% a year and SPCQ charges 1.31%, so SPCQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPCG against SPCQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SPCG-SPCQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.