Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SH vs SPXU: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SH finished 1.6 points over and SPXU 3.4 points over.

ProShares Short S&P500 and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−1.9%SH returned, 3 months
−7.9%SPXU returned, 3 months
+1.4 ptsSH from its stated multiple
+2.0 ptsSPXU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SPXU scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SH 52.5SPXU 89.70.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

SH1.4 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
SPY +3.3% ×1 implies−3.3%SH returned−1.9%SPY +3.3% ×1 implies−3.3%SH returned−1.9%
SPXU2 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
SPY +3.3% ×3 implies−9.9%SPXU returned−7.9%SPY +3.3% ×3 implies−9.9%SPXU returned−7.9%

Performance, window by window

SH and SPXU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SHSPXUSHSPXUSHSPXU
1 month+1.6%+4.2%+1.1%+3.2%+0.6 pts+1.0 pts
3 months−1.9%−7.9%−3.3%−9.9%+1.4 pts+2.0 pts
6 months−11.7%−34.9%−16.0%−48.1%+4.3 pts+13.2 pts
1 year−10.4%−35.2%−17.5%−52.5%+7.1 pts+17.3 pts
3 years−32.9%−80.3%−77.9%−233.6%+45.0 pts+153.4 pts
Since launch−90.3%−100.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SH and SPXU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500
Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-1x-3x
OnSPYSPY
Segmentus large capus large cap
Fund returned, 3 months−1.9%−7.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.3%+3.3%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−3.3%−9.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.4 pts+2.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−10.4%−35.2%
Difference from stated, over that window+7.1 pts+17.3 pts
Underlying volatility12%12%
Difference over the days both have traded+1.4 pts+2.0 pts
Expense rationot published0.90%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

SH in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SH returned −1.9% where its own daily promise gave −3.5%, 1.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times SPY's 3.3% implies −3.3%, which makes SH look 1.4 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SH aims to return -1 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPY moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPXU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SPXU returned −7.9% where its own daily promise gave −11.3%, 3.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times SPY's 3.3% implies −9.9%, which makes SPXU look 2.0 points over. 1.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPXU aims to return -3 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SH or SPXU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SH finished 1.4 points from what its multiple implies and SPXU finished 2.0 points from its own, so SH came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SH and SPXU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P 500, SH at -1 times and SPXU at -3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SH or SPXU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SH’s moved at 12% annualized and SPXU’s at 12%, so SH has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SH or SPXU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SH against SPXU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SH against SPXU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SH-SPXU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources