Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SDS vs UPRO: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SDS finished 2.5 points over and UPRO 2.6 points short.

ProShares UltraShort S&P500 and ProShares UltraPro S&P500, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−4.8%SDS returned, 3 months
+6.4%UPRO returned, 3 months
+1.8 ptsSDS from its stated multiple
−3.5 ptsUPRO from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SDS scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SDS 79.8UPRO 47.70.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

SDS1.8 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
SPY +3.3% ×2 implies−6.6%SDS returned−4.8%SPY +3.3% ×2 implies−6.6%SDS returned−4.8%
UPRO3.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
SPY +3.3% ×3 implies+9.9%UPRO returned+6.4%SPY +3.3% ×3 implies+9.9%UPRO returned+6.4%

Performance, window by window

SDS and UPRO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SDSUPROSDSUPROSDSUPRO
1 month+2.9%−4.2%+2.1%−3.2%+0.8 pts−1.1 pts
3 months−4.8%+6.4%−6.6%+9.9%+1.8 pts−3.5 pts
6 months−23.9%+44.3%−32.0%+48.1%+8.2 pts−3.7 pts
1 year−23.2%+39.3%−35.0%+52.5%+11.8 pts−13.3 pts
3 years−62.4%+225.5%−155.8%+233.6%+93.4 pts−8.1 pts
Since launch−99.5%+7078.1%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SDS and UPRO on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDS
ProShares UltraShort S&P500
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P500
Aims to return three times the daily move of the S&P 500
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-2x+3x
OnSPYSPY
Segmentus large capus large cap
Fund returned, 3 months−4.8%+6.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.3%+3.3%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.6%+9.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.8 pts−3.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−23.2%+39.3%
Difference from stated, over that window+11.8 pts−13.3 pts
Underlying volatility12%12%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−3.5 pts
Expense ratio0.91%0.89%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

SDS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SDS returned −4.8% where its own daily promise gave −7.3%, 2.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPY's 3.3% implies −6.6%, which makes SDS look 1.8 points over. 0.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SDS aims to return -2 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPY moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UPRO in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UPRO returned +6.4% where its own daily promise gave +9.0%, 2.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times SPY's 3.3% implies +9.9%, which makes UPRO look 3.5 points short. 0.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UPRO aims to return +3 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SDS or UPRO?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SDS finished 1.8 points from what its multiple implies and UPRO finished 3.5 points from its own, so SDS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SDS and UPRO levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P 500, SDS at -2 times and UPRO at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SDS or UPRO?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SDS’s moved at 12% annualized and UPRO’s at 12%, so SDS has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SDS or UPRO for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SDS or UPRO?
SDS charges 0.91% a year and UPRO charges 0.89%, so UPRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDS against UPRO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDS against UPRO, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SDS-UPRO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources