Data as of .
SCC vs WANT: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, SCC finished 2.5 points over and WANT 2.2 points short.
ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SCC scores higher
Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCC | WANT | SCC | WANT | SCC | WANT | |
| 1 month | +9.1% | −13.4% | +8.4% | −12.5% | +0.8 pts | −0.8 pts |
| 3 months | +5.3% | −13.7% | +5.9% | −8.8% | −0.6 pts | −4.9 pts |
| 6 months | −6.0% | −4.9% | −4.6% | +6.9% | −1.4 pts | −11.8 pts |
| 1 year | +7.7% | −28.8% | +8.2% | −12.3% | −0.5 pts | −16.5 pts |
| 3 years | −47.8% | +16.5% | −69.6% | +104.4% | +21.8 pts | −87.9 pts |
| Since launch | −99.6% | +52.8% | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful |
| SCC ProShares UltraShort Consumer Discretionary Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of STATE STREET(R) CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY SELECT SECTOR SPDR(R) ETF (XLY) | WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X ETF Aims to return three times the daily move of STATE STREET(R) CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY SELECT SECTOR SPDR(R) ETF (XLY) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Direxion |
| Sets out to return | -2x | +3x |
| On | XLY | XLY |
| Segment | sector | sector |
| Fund returned, 3 months | +5.3% | −13.7% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −2.9% | −2.9% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +5.9% | −8.8% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −0.6 pts | −4.9 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | +7.7% | −28.8% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −0.5 pts | −16.5 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 21% | 21% |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 1.00% |
| Launched | Jan 4, 2010 | Nov 29, 2018 |
SCC in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SCC returned +5.3% where its own daily promise gave +2.8%, 2.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times XLY's −2.9% implies +5.9%, which makes SCC look 0.6 points short. 3.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SCC aims to return -2 times XLY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. XLY moved at 21% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
WANT in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: WANT returned −13.7% where its own daily promise gave −11.4%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times XLY's −2.9% implies −8.8%, which makes WANT look 4.9 points short. 2.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. WANT aims to return +3 times XLY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, SCC or WANT?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SCC finished 0.6 points from what its multiple implies and WANT finished 4.9 points from its own, so SCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are SCC and WANT levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on STATE STREET(R) CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY SELECT SECTOR SPDR(R) ETF, SCC at -2 times and WANT at +3 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, SCC or WANT?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SCC’s moved at 21% annualized and WANT’s at 21%, so SCC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold SCC or WANT for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, SCC or WANT?
- SCC charges 0.95% a year and WANT charges 1.00%, so SCC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCC against WANT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SCC-WANT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.