Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

SAA vs SBB: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SAA finished 1.4 points short and SBB 1.7 points over.

ProShares Ultra SmallCap600 and ProShares Short SmallCap600, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−3.3%SAA returned, 3 months
+2.0%SBB returned, 3 months
−1.8 ptsSAA from its stated multiple
+1.3 ptsSBB from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SAA scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SAA 89SBB 54.50.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

SAA1.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IJR −0.7% ×2 implies−1.5%SAA returned−3.3%IJR −0.7% ×2 implies−1.5%SAA returned−3.3%
SBB1.3 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IJR −0.7% ×1 implies+0.7%SBB returned+2.0%IJR −0.7% ×1 implies+0.7%SBB returned+2.0%

Performance, window by window

SAA and SBB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
SAASBBSAASBBSAASBB
1 month−9.6%+5.3%−9.2%+4.6%−0.4 pts+0.7 pts
3 months−3.3%+2.0%−1.5%+0.7%−1.8 pts+1.3 pts
6 months+31.8%−13.0%+34.1%−17.0%−2.2 pts+4.0 pts
1 year+32.4%−13.5%+39.9%−19.9%−7.5 pts+6.5 pts
3 years+71.8%−28.0%+106.1%−53.1%−34.4 pts+25.1 pts
Since launch+1017.4%−91.2%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
SAA and SBB on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SAA
ProShares Ultra SmallCap600
Aims to return twice the daily move of ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF (IJR)
SBB
ProShares Short SmallCap600
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF (IJR)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnIJRIJR
Segmentus small capus small cap
Fund returned, 3 months−3.3%+2.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−0.7%−0.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−1.5%+0.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.8 pts+1.3 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+32.4%−13.5%
Difference from stated, over that window−7.5 pts+6.5 pts
Underlying volatility13%13%
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

SAA in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SAA returned −3.3% where its own daily promise gave −1.9%, 1.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times IJR's −0.7% implies −1.5%, which makes SAA look 1.8 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SAA aims to return +2 times IJR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IJR moved at 13% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SBB in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SBB returned +2.0% where its own daily promise gave +0.3%, 1.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times IJR's −0.7% implies +0.7%, which makes SBB look 1.3 points over. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SBB aims to return -1 times IJR's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SAA or SBB?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, SAA finished 1.8 points from what its multiple implies and SBB finished 1.3 points from its own, so SBB came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SAA and SBB levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ISHARES CORE S&P SMALL-CAP ETF, SAA at +2 times and SBB at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SAA or SBB?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SAA’s moved at 13% annualized and SBB’s at 13%, so SAA has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SAA or SBB for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SAA against SBB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SAA against SBB, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/SAA-SBB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources