Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

RKLX vs RKX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, RKLX finished 2.7 points from its stated multiple and RKX 3.4.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF and Corgi RKLB 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−70.2%RKLX returned, 3 months
−66.6%RKX returned, 3 months
+6.8 ptsRKLX from its stated multiple
+9.6 ptsRKX from its stated multiple
RKLX6.8 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
RKLB −38.5% ×2 implies−77.0%RKLX returned−70.2%RKLB −38.5% ×2 implies−77.0%RKLX returned−70.2%
RKX3.4 pts over its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
RKLB −22.4% ×2 implies−44.9%RKX returned−41.5%RKLB −22.4% ×2 implies−44.9%RKX returned−41.5%

Performance, window by window

RKLX and RKX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
RKLXRKXRKLXRKXRKLXRKX
1 month−42.2%−41.5%−44.9%−44.9%+2.7 pts+3.4 pts
3 months−70.2%not published−77.0%not published+6.8 ptsnot published
6 months−54.9%not published−16.0%not published−38.9 ptsnot published
1 year−46.0%not published+60.0%not published−105.9 ptsnot published
Since launch+172.5%−66.6%not meaningful−76.1%not meaningful+9.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
RKLX and RKX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
RKLX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of RKLB
RKX
Corgi RKLB 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of RKLB
IssuerDefianceCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnRKLBRKLB
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−70.2%−41.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months−38.5%−22.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−77.0%−44.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+6.8 pts+3.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−46.0%−66.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−105.9 pts+9.6 pts
Underlying volatility80%39%
Difference over the days both have traded+2.7 pts+3.4 pts
Expense ratio1.63%0.45%
LaunchedMar 13, 2025Jun 30, 2026

RKLX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: RKLX returned −70.2% where its own daily promise gave −68.0%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times RKLB's −38.5% implies −77.0%, which makes RKLX look 6.8 points over. 9.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. RKLX aims to return +2 times RKLB's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. RKLB moved at 80% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

RKX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: RKX returned −41.5% where its own daily promise gave −40.9%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times RKLB's −22.4% implies −44.9%, which makes RKX look 3.4 points over. 4.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. RKX aims to return +2 times RKLB's move each day, then resets. RKLB moved at 39% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, RKLX or RKX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, RKLX finished 6.8 points from what its multiple implies and RKX finished 3.4 points from its own, so RKX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are RKLX and RKX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on RKLB, RKLX at +2 times and RKX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, RKLX or RKX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window RKLX’s moved at 80% annualized and RKX’s at 39%, so RKLX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold RKLX or RKX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, RKLX or RKX?
RKLX charges 1.63% a year and RKX charges 0.45%, so RKX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RKLX against RKX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RKLX against RKX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/RKLX-RKX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources