Which came closer to its stated multiple, RGTC or RGTU?

Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, RGTC finished 0.1 points from what its multiple implies and RGTU finished 2.6 points from its own, so RGTC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are RGTC and RGTU levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on RGTI, RGTC at +2 times and RGTU at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, RGTC or RGTU?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window RGTC’s moved at 70% annualized and RGTU’s at 83%, so RGTU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold RGTC or RGTU for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of Sep 11, 2026.

RGTC vs RGTU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, RGTC finished 0.1 points from its stated multiple and RGTU 0.6.

Corgi RGTI 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−21.9%RGTC returned, 3 months

−57.1%RGTU returned, 3 months

−11.5 ptsRGTC from its stated multiple

−2.6 ptsRGTU from its stated multiple

RGTCOn its stated multiple · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026

RGTU2.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026

Performance, window by window

RGTC and RGTU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
Window	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	RGTC	RGTU	RGTC	RGTU	RGTC	RGTU
1 month	−34.1%	−34.8%	−34.2%	−34.2%	+0.1 pts	−0.6 pts
3 months	not published	−57.1%	not published	−54.4%	not published	−2.6 pts
6 months	not published	−49.1%	not published	−11.1%	not published	−38.0 pts
1 year	not published	−75.7%	not published	−17.0%	not published	−58.7 pts
Since launch	−21.9%	−59.0%	−10.4%	+65.6%	−11.5 pts	−124.6 pts

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

RGTC and RGTU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	RGTC Corgi RGTI 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of RGTI	RGTU Tradr 2X Long RGTI Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of RGTI
Issuer	Corgi	Tradr
Sets out to return	+2x	+2x
On	RGTI	RGTI
Segment	company	company
Fund returned, 3 months	−34.1%	−57.1%
Underlying returned, 3 months	−17.1%	−27.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months	−34.2%	−54.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months	+0.1 pts	−2.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch	−21.9%	−75.7%
Difference from stated, over that window	−11.5 pts	−58.7 pts
Underlying volatility	70%	83%
Difference over the days both have traded	+0.1 pts	−0.6 pts
Expense ratio	not published	1.30%
Launched	Jul 14, 2026	Jun 24, 2025

RGTC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: RGTC returned −34.1% where its own daily promise gave −34.1%, 0.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times RGTI's −17.1% implies −34.2%, which makes RGTC look 0.1 points over. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. RGTC aims to return +2 times RGTI's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. RGTI moved at 70% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

RGTU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: RGTU returned −57.1% where its own daily promise gave −55.3%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times RGTI's −27.2% implies −54.4%, which makes RGTU look 2.6 points short. 0.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. RGTU aims to return +2 times RGTI's move each day, then resets. RGTI moved at 83% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, RGTC or RGTU?: Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, RGTC finished 0.1 points from what its multiple implies and RGTU finished 2.6 points from its own, so RGTC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are RGTC and RGTU levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on RGTI, RGTC at +2 times and RGTU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, RGTC or RGTU?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window RGTC’s moved at 70% annualized and RGTU’s at 83%, so RGTU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold RGTC or RGTU for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

RGTC against RGTU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, RGTC against RGTU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/RGTC-RGTU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources