Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QID vs TQQQ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, QID finished 4.3 points over and TQQQ 2.4 points short.

ProShares UltraShort QQQ and ProShares UltraPro QQQ, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+2.2%QID returned, 3 months
−8.2%TQQQ returned, 3 months
+0.6 ptsQID from its stated multiple
−5.8 ptsTQQQ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: QID scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

QID 98.8TQQQ 57.40.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QID0.6 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ −0.8% ×2 implies+1.6%QID returned+2.2%QQQ −0.8% ×2 implies+1.6%QID returned+2.2%
TQQQ5.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
QQQ −0.8% ×3 implies−2.4%TQQQ returned−8.2%QQQ −0.8% ×3 implies−2.4%TQQQ returned−8.2%

Performance, window by window

QID and TQQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
QIDTQQQQIDTQQQQIDTQQQ
1 month+3.0%−4.8%+2.4%−3.7%+0.5 pts−1.2 pts
3 months+2.2%−8.2%+1.6%−2.4%+0.6 pts−5.8 pts
6 months−31.8%+55.1%−41.4%+62.1%+9.6 pts−6.9 pts
1 year−33.5%+49.5%−46.0%+68.9%+12.4 pts−19.4 pts
3 years−73.7%+262.4%−190.2%+285.3%+116.5 pts−22.9 pts
Since launch−99.9%+34453.8%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QID and TQQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QID
ProShares UltraShort QQQ
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the Nasdaq-100
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
Aims to return three times the daily move of the Nasdaq-100
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-2x+3x
OnQQQQQQ
Segmentus large capus large cap
Fund returned, 3 months+2.2%−8.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months−0.8%−0.8%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+1.6%−2.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months+0.6 pts−5.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−33.5%+49.5%
Difference from stated, over that window+12.4 pts−19.4 pts
Underlying volatility22%22%
Expense ratio0.95%0.82%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Feb 11, 2010

QID in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: QID returned +2.2% where its own daily promise gave −2.1%, 4.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times QQQ's −0.8% implies +1.6%, which makes QID look 0.6 points over. 3.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. QID aims to return -2 times QQQ's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. QQQ moved at 22% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TQQQ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TQQQ returned −8.2% where its own daily promise gave −5.9%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times QQQ's −0.8% implies −2.4%, which makes TQQQ look 5.8 points short. 3.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TQQQ aims to return +3 times QQQ's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, QID or TQQQ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, QID finished 0.6 points from what its multiple implies and TQQQ finished 5.8 points from its own, so QID came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are QID and TQQQ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the Nasdaq-100, QID at -2 times and TQQQ at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, QID or TQQQ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window QID’s moved at 22% annualized and TQQQ’s at 22%, so QID has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold QID or TQQQ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, QID or TQQQ?
QID charges 0.95% a year and TQQQ charges 0.82%, so TQQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QID against TQQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QID against TQQQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/QID-TQQQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources