Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PST vs TBX: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, PST finished 2.1 points over and TBX 1.5 points over.

ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury and ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+6.9%PST returned, 3 months
+3.8%TBX returned, 3 months
+2.1 ptsPST from its stated multiple
+1.5 ptsTBX from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: PST scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

PST 69TBX 450.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

PST2.1 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IEF −2.4% ×2 implies+4.7%PST returned+6.9%IEF −2.4% ×2 implies+4.7%PST returned+6.9%
TBX1.5 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IEF −2.4% ×1 implies+2.4%TBX returned+3.8%IEF −2.4% ×1 implies+2.4%TBX returned+3.8%

Performance, window by window

PST and TBX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
PSTTBXPSTTBXPSTTBX
1 month+4.2%+2.1%+3.5%+1.7%+0.7 pts+0.4 pts
3 months+6.9%+3.8%+4.7%+2.4%+2.1 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+10.4%+5.8%+5.7%+2.8%+4.7 pts+3.0 pts
1 year+15.2%+8.9%+5.4%+2.7%+9.7 pts+6.1 pts
3 years+14.1%+13.0%−17.5%−8.8%+31.6 pts+21.8 pts
Since launch−47.4%−12.5%−99.8%−38.0%+52.5 pts+25.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PST and TBX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of 10-year Treasuries (IEF)
TBX
ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of 10-year Treasuries (IEF)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-2x-1x
OnIEFIEF
Segmentbondbond
Fund returned, 3 months+6.9%+3.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months−2.4%−2.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+4.7%+2.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months+2.1 pts+1.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+15.2%+8.9%
Difference from stated, over that window+9.7 pts+6.1 pts
Underlying volatility5%5%
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Apr 5, 2011

PST in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: PST returned +6.9% where its own daily promise gave +4.7%, 2.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IEF's −2.4% implies +4.7%, which makes PST look 2.1 points over. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. PST aims to return -2 times IEF's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IEF moved at 5% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TBX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TBX returned +3.8% where its own daily promise gave +2.4%, 1.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times IEF's −2.4% implies +2.4%, which makes TBX look 1.5 points over. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TBX aims to return -1 times IEF's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, PST or TBX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, PST finished 2.1 points from what its multiple implies and TBX finished 1.5 points from its own, so TBX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are PST and TBX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on 10-year Treasuries, PST at -2 times and TBX at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, PST or TBX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window PST’s moved at 5% annualized and TBX’s at 5%, so PST has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold PST or TBX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PST against TBX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PST against TBX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/PST-TBX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources