Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PLTG vs PLTU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, PLTG finished 3.1 points from its stated multiple and PLTU 2.6.

Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF and Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+45.1%PLTG returned, 3 months
+47.0%PLTU returned, 3 months
−16.2 ptsPLTG from its stated multiple
−14.3 ptsPLTU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: PLTU scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

PLTG 10.1PLTU 29.90.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

PLTG16.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PLTG returned+45.1%PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PLTG returned+45.1%
PLTU14.3 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PLTU returned+47.0%PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PLTU returned+47.0%

Performance, window by window

PLTG and PLTU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
PLTGPLTUPLTGPLTUPLTGPLTU
1 month−7.6%−7.0%−4.5%−4.5%−3.1 pts−2.6 pts
3 months+45.1%+47.0%+61.3%+61.3%−16.2 pts−14.3 pts
6 months−7.0%−4.9%+21.6%+21.6%−28.6 pts−26.5 pts
1 year−36.2%−33.9%+3.5%+3.5%−39.7 pts−37.4 pts
Since launch+15.5%+113.8%+96.6%not meaningful−81.0 ptsnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PLTG and PLTU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PLTG
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
PLTU
Direxion Daily PLTR Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
IssuerLeverage SharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnPLTRPLTR
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+45.1%+47.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months+30.7%+30.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+61.3%+61.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−16.2 pts−14.3 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−36.2%−33.9%
Difference from stated, over that window−39.7 pts−37.4 pts
Underlying volatility81%81%
Difference over the days both have traded−3.1 pts−2.6 pts
Expense ratio0.78%0.97%
LaunchedApr 25, 2025Dec 11, 2024

PLTG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: PLTG returned +45.1% where its own daily promise gave +50.5%, 5.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times PLTR's 30.7% implies +61.3%, which makes PLTG look 16.2 points short. 10.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. PLTG aims to return +2 times PLTR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. PLTR moved at 81% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

PLTU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: PLTU returned +47.0% where its own daily promise gave +50.5%, 3.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times PLTR's 30.7% implies +61.3%, which makes PLTU look 14.3 points short. PLTU aims to return +2 times PLTR's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, PLTG or PLTU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, PLTG finished 16.2 points from what its multiple implies and PLTU finished 14.3 points from its own, so PLTU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are PLTG and PLTU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Palantir Technologies, PLTG at +2 times and PLTU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, PLTG or PLTU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window PLTG’s moved at 81% annualized and PLTU’s at 81%, so PLTG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold PLTG or PLTU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, PLTG or PLTU?
PLTG charges 0.78% a year and PLTU charges 0.97%, so PLTG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PLTG against PLTU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PLTG against PLTU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/PLTG-PLTU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources