Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

PLTA vs PTIR: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, PLTA finished 2.9 points from its stated multiple and PTIR 2.8.

ProShares Ultra PLTR and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+45.7%PLTA returned, 3 months
+46.6%PTIR returned, 3 months
−15.6 ptsPLTA from its stated multiple
−14.7 ptsPTIR from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: PTIR scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

PLTA 16.4PTIR 22.90.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

PLTA15.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PLTA returned+45.7%PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PLTA returned+45.7%
PTIR14.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PTIR returned+46.6%PLTR +30.7% ×2 implies+61.3%PTIR returned+46.6%

Performance, window by window

PLTA and PTIR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
PLTAPTIRPLTAPTIRPLTAPTIR
1 month−7.4%−7.3%−4.5%−4.5%−2.9 pts−2.8 pts
3 months+45.7%+46.6%+61.3%+61.3%−15.6 pts−14.7 pts
6 months−6.2%−4.8%+21.6%+21.6%−27.8 pts−26.4 pts
1 year−36.0%−32.9%+3.5%+3.5%−39.5 pts−36.4 pts
Since launch−37.8%+973.3%+0.6%not meaningful−38.3 ptsnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
PLTA and PTIR on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PLTA
ProShares Ultra PLTR
Aims to return twice the daily move of Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Palantir Technologies (PLTR)
IssuerProSharesGraniteShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnPLTRPLTR
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+45.7%+46.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months+30.7%+30.7%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+61.3%+61.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−15.6 pts−14.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−36.0%−32.9%
Difference from stated, over that window−39.5 pts−36.4 pts
Underlying volatility81%81%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.9 pts−2.8 pts
Expense ratio0.95%1.04%
LaunchedSep 10, 2025Sep 4, 2024

PLTA in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: PLTA returned +45.7% where its own daily promise gave +50.5%, 4.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times PLTR's 30.7% implies +61.3%, which makes PLTA look 15.6 points short. 10.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. PLTA aims to return +2 times PLTR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. PLTR moved at 81% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

PTIR in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: PTIR returned +46.6% where its own daily promise gave +50.5%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times PLTR's 30.7% implies +61.3%, which makes PTIR look 14.7 points short. PTIR aims to return +2 times PLTR's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, PLTA or PTIR?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, PLTA finished 15.6 points from what its multiple implies and PTIR finished 14.7 points from its own, so PTIR came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are PLTA and PTIR levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Palantir Technologies, PLTA at +2 times and PTIR at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, PLTA or PTIR?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window PLTA’s moved at 81% annualized and PTIR’s at 81%, so PLTA has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold PLTA or PTIR for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, PLTA or PTIR?
PLTA charges 0.95% a year and PTIR charges 1.04%, so PLTA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PLTA against PTIR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PLTA against PTIR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/PLTA-PTIR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources