Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ORCS vs ORCX: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, ORCS finished 1.5 points over and ORCX 2.2 points short.

Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+14.6%ORCS returned, 3 months
−40.0%ORCX returned, 3 months
−3.5 ptsORCS from its stated multiple
−3.9 ptsORCX from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: ORCX scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

ORCS 46.7ORCX 66.10.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ORCS3.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ORCL −18.1% ×1 implies+18.1%ORCS returned+14.6%ORCL −18.1% ×1 implies+18.1%ORCS returned+14.6%
ORCX3.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ORCL −18.1% ×2 implies−36.2%ORCX returned−40.0%ORCL −18.1% ×2 implies−36.2%ORCX returned−40.0%

Performance, window by window

ORCS and ORCX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
ORCSORCXORCSORCXORCSORCX
1 month+0.4%−6.7%+2.0%−3.9%−1.6 pts−2.8 pts
3 months+14.6%−40.0%+18.1%−36.2%−3.5 pts−3.9 pts
6 months−12.4%−25.8%+2.4%−4.8%−14.8 pts−21.0 pts
1 yearnot published−84.8%not published−101.3%not published+16.5 pts
Since launch+17.9%−63.7%+32.7%−24.7%−14.8 pts−39.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ORCS and ORCX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ORCS
Direxion Daily ORCL Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of ORCL
ORCX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long ORCL ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of ORCL
IssuerDirexionDefiance
Sets out to return-1x+2x
OnORCLORCL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+14.6%−40.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−18.1%−18.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+18.1%−36.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−3.5 pts−3.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+17.9%−84.8%
Difference from stated, over that window−14.8 pts+16.5 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−2.8 pts
Expense rationot published1.31%
LaunchedNov 19, 2025Feb 7, 2025

ORCS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ORCS returned +14.6% where its own daily promise gave +13.0%, 1.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times ORCL's −18.1% implies +18.1%, which makes ORCS look 3.5 points short. 5.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ORCS aims to return -1 times ORCL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ORCL moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ORCX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ORCX returned −40.0% where its own daily promise gave −37.9%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ORCL's −18.1% implies −36.2%, which makes ORCX look 3.9 points short. 1.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ORCX aims to return +2 times ORCL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ORCS or ORCX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ORCS finished 3.5 points from what its multiple implies and ORCX finished 3.9 points from its own, so ORCS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ORCS and ORCX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ORCL, ORCS at -1 times and ORCX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ORCS or ORCX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ORCS’s moved at 56% annualized and ORCX’s at 56%, so ORCS has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ORCS or ORCX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ORCS against ORCX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ORCS against ORCX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ORCS-ORCX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources