Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NVDQ vs NVDU: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, NVDQ finished 0.1 points over and NVDU 2.7 points short.

T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF and Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−21.8%NVDQ returned, 3 months
+6.4%NVDU returned, 3 months
−8.8 ptsNVDQ from its stated multiple
−6.7 ptsNVDU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: NVDU scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NVDQ 18.6NVDU 44.40.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NVDQ8.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies−13.0%NVDQ returned−21.8%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies−13.0%NVDQ returned−21.8%
NVDU6.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDU returned+6.4%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDU returned+6.4%

Performance, window by window

NVDQ and NVDU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NVDQNVDUNVDQNVDUNVDQNVDU
1 month+0.6%−7.1%+5.0%−5.0%−4.4 pts−2.1 pts
3 months−21.8%+6.4%−13.0%+13.0%−8.8 pts−6.7 pts
6 months−46.3%+29.6%−42.8%+42.8%−3.5 pts−13.1 pts
1 year−57.0%+19.3%−47.0%+47.0%−10.0 pts−27.8 pts
Since launch−99.4%+563.3%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NVDQ and NVDU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NVDQ
T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDU
Direxion Daily NVDA Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
IssuerT-REXDirexion
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnNVDANVDA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−21.8%+6.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+6.5%+6.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−13.0%+13.0%
Difference from stated, 3 months−8.8 pts−6.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−57.0%+19.3%
Difference from stated, over that window−10.0 pts−27.8 pts
Underlying volatility40%40%
Difference over the days both have traded−8.8 pts−2.1 pts
Expense ratio1.05%0.92%
LaunchedOct 19, 2023Sep 13, 2023

NVDQ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDQ returned −21.8% where its own daily promise gave −21.9%, 0.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies −13.0%, which makes NVDQ look 8.8 points short. 8.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDQ aims to return -2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 40% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDU returned +6.4% where its own daily promise gave +9.1%, 2.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies +13.0%, which makes NVDU look 6.7 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDU aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDQ or NVDU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NVDQ finished 8.8 points from what its multiple implies and NVDU finished 6.7 points from its own, so NVDU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDQ and NVDU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDQ at -2 times and NVDU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDQ or NVDU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDQ’s moved at 40% annualized and NVDU’s at 40%, so NVDQ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDQ or NVDU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDQ or NVDU?
NVDQ charges 1.05% a year and NVDU charges 0.92%, so NVDU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NVDQ against NVDU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NVDQ against NVDU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NVDQ-NVDU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources