Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NVDQ vs NVDS: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, NVDQ finished 0.1 points over and NVDS 1.5 points over.

T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF and Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−21.8%NVDQ returned, 3 months
−14.1%NVDS returned, 3 months
−8.8 ptsNVDQ from its stated multiple
−4.3 ptsNVDS from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: NVDS scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NVDQ 18.6NVDS 48.80.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NVDQ8.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies−13.0%NVDQ returned−21.8%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies−13.0%NVDQ returned−21.8%
NVDS4.3 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×1.5 implies−9.8%NVDS returned−14.1%NVDA +6.5% ×1.5 implies−9.8%NVDS returned−14.1%

Performance, window by window

NVDQ and NVDS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NVDQNVDSNVDQNVDSNVDQNVDS
1 month+0.6%+1.7%+5.0%+3.7%−4.4 pts−2.1 pts
3 months−21.8%−14.1%−13.0%−9.8%−8.8 pts−4.3 pts
6 months−46.3%−33.4%−42.8%−32.1%−3.5 pts−1.3 pts
1 year−57.0%−39.8%−47.0%−35.3%−10.0 pts−4.5 pts
3 yearsnot published−95.0%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch−99.4%−99.2%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NVDQ and NVDS on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NVDQ
T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDS
Tradr 1.5X Short NVDA Daily ETF
Aims to return 1.5 times the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
IssuerT-REXTradr
Sets out to return-2x-1.5x
OnNVDANVDA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−21.8%−14.1%
Underlying returned, 3 months+6.5%+6.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−13.0%−9.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−8.8 pts−4.3 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−57.0%−39.8%
Difference from stated, over that window−10.0 pts−4.5 pts
Underlying volatility40%40%
Difference over the days both have traded−8.8 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio1.05%1.15%
LaunchedOct 19, 2023Jul 14, 2022

NVDQ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDQ returned −21.8% where its own daily promise gave −21.9%, 0.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies −13.0%, which makes NVDQ look 8.8 points short. 8.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDQ aims to return -2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 40% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDS returned −14.1% where its own daily promise gave −15.6%, 1.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1.5 times NVDA's 6.5% implies −9.8%, which makes NVDS look 4.3 points short. 5.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1.5 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDS aims to return -1.5 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1.5 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVDQ or NVDS?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NVDQ finished 8.8 points from what its multiple implies and NVDS finished 4.3 points from its own, so NVDS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVDQ and NVDS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVDQ at -2 times and NVDS at -1.5 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVDQ or NVDS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVDQ’s moved at 40% annualized and NVDS’s at 40%, so NVDQ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVDQ or NVDS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVDQ or NVDS?
NVDQ charges 1.05% a year and NVDS charges 1.15%, so NVDQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NVDQ against NVDS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NVDQ against NVDS, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NVDQ-NVDS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources