Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NVC vs NVDX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NVC finished 1.5 points from its stated multiple and NVDX 2.4.

Corgi NVDA 2x Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+14.2%NVC returned, 3 months
+5.2%NVDX returned, 3 months
−4.2 ptsNVC from its stated multiple
−7.8 ptsNVDX from its stated multiple
NVC1.5 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA −2.5% ×2 implies−5.0%NVC returned−6.5%NVDA −2.5% ×2 implies−5.0%NVC returned−6.5%
NVDX7.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDX returned+5.2%NVDA +6.5% ×2 implies+13.0%NVDX returned+5.2%

Performance, window by window

NVC and NVDX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NVCNVDXNVCNVDXNVCNVDX
1 month−6.5%−7.3%−5.0%−5.0%−1.5 pts−2.4 pts
3 monthsnot published+5.2%not published+13.0%not published−7.8 pts
6 monthsnot published+26.1%not published+42.8%not published−16.6 pts
1 yearnot published+12.7%not published+47.0%not published−34.3 pts
Since launch+14.2%+802.1%+18.4%not meaningful−4.2 ptsnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NVC and NVDX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NVC
Corgi NVDA 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDX
T-REX 2X LONG NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
IssuerCorgiT-REX
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnNVDANVDA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−6.5%+5.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months−2.5%+6.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−5.0%+13.0%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.5 pts−7.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+14.2%+12.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−4.2 pts−34.3 pts
Underlying volatility42%40%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.5 pts−2.4 pts
Expense ratio0.45%1.05%
LaunchedJun 30, 2026Oct 19, 2023

NVC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: NVC returned −6.5% where its own daily promise gave −6.2%, 0.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NVDA's −2.5% implies −5.0%, which makes NVC look 1.5 points short. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVC aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 42% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NVDX returned +5.2% where its own daily promise gave +9.1%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NVDA's 6.5% implies +13.0%, which makes NVDX look 7.8 points short. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVDX aims to return +2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. NVDA moved at 40% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVC or NVDX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NVC finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and NVDX finished 7.8 points from its own, so NVC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVC and NVDX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVC at +2 times and NVDX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVC or NVDX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVC’s moved at 42% annualized and NVDX’s at 40%, so NVC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVC or NVDX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVC or NVDX?
NVC charges 0.45% a year and NVDX charges 1.05%, so NVC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NVC against NVDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NVC against NVDX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NVC-NVDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources