Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NOWL vs NOWX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NOWL finished 4.6 points from its stated multiple and NOWX 3.6.

GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF and Corgi NOW 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+47.8%NOWL returned, 3 months
+47.2%NOWX returned, 3 months
−11.7 ptsNOWL from its stated multiple
−5.6 ptsNOWX from its stated multiple
NOWL11.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NOW +29.7% ×2 implies+59.5%NOWL returned+47.8%NOW +29.7% ×2 implies+59.5%NOWL returned+47.8%
NOWX3.6 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
NOW +6.1% ×2 implies+12.1%NOWX returned+8.5%NOW +6.1% ×2 implies+12.1%NOWX returned+8.5%

Performance, window by window

NOWL and NOWX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NOWLNOWXNOWLNOWXNOWLNOWX
1 month+7.5%+8.5%+12.1%+12.1%−4.6 pts−3.6 pts
3 months+47.8%not published+59.5%not published−11.7 ptsnot published
6 months−2.0%not published+33.3%not published−35.3 ptsnot published
1 year−69.7%not published−58.8%not published−10.9 ptsnot published
Since launch−71.8%+47.2%−61.5%+52.8%−10.3 pts−5.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NOWL and NOWX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NOWL
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NOW
NOWX
Corgi NOW 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NOW
IssuerGraniteSharesCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnNOWNOW
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+47.8%+8.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months+29.7%+6.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+59.5%+12.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months−11.7 pts−3.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−69.7%+47.2%
Difference from stated, over that window−10.9 pts−5.6 pts
Underlying volatility61%62%
Difference over the days both have traded−4.6 pts−3.6 pts
Expense ratio1.50%not published
LaunchedJul 15, 2025Jul 14, 2026

NOWL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NOWL returned +47.8% where its own daily promise gave +54.2%, 6.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NOW's 29.7% implies +59.5%, which makes NOWL look 11.7 points short. 5.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NOWL aims to return +2 times NOW's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NOW moved at 61% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NOWX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: NOWX returned +8.5% where its own daily promise gave +9.1%, 0.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NOW's 6.1% implies +12.1%, which makes NOWX look 3.6 points short. 3.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NOWX aims to return +2 times NOW's move each day, then resets. NOW moved at 62% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NOWL or NOWX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NOWL finished 11.7 points from what its multiple implies and NOWX finished 3.6 points from its own, so NOWX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NOWL and NOWX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NOW, NOWL at +2 times and NOWX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NOWL or NOWX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NOWL’s moved at 61% annualized and NOWX’s at 62%, so NOWX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NOWL or NOWX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NOWL against NOWX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NOWL against NOWX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NOWL-NOWX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources