Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

NBIG vs NEBX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NBIG finished 2.8 points from its stated multiple and NEBX 3.2.

Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−42.3%NBIG returned, 3 months
−42.5%NEBX returned, 3 months
−35.6 ptsNBIG from its stated multiple
−35.8 ptsNEBX from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: NBIG scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

NBIG 42.5NEBX 38.10.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

NBIG35.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NBIS −3.4% ×2 implies−6.7%NBIG returned−42.3%NBIS −3.4% ×2 implies−6.7%NBIG returned−42.3%
NEBX35.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
NBIS −3.4% ×2 implies−6.7%NEBX returned−42.5%NBIS −3.4% ×2 implies−6.7%NEBX returned−42.5%

Performance, window by window

NBIG and NEBX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
NBIGNEBXNBIGNEBXNBIGNEBX
1 month−29.6%−30.0%−26.7%−26.7%−2.8 pts−3.3 pts
3 months−42.3%−42.5%−6.7%−6.7%−35.6 pts−35.8 pts
6 months+82.0%+83.1%+197.6%+197.6%−115.6 pts−114.5 pts
1 yearnot published+74.3%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningful
Since launch−1.2%+50.8%+158.0%not meaningful−159.2 ptsnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
NBIG and NEBX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NBIG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NBIS
NEBX
Tradr 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of NBIS
IssuerLeverage SharesTradr
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnNBISNBIS
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−42.3%−42.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months−3.4%−3.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.7%−6.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−35.6 pts−35.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−1.2%+74.3%
Difference from stated, over that window−159.2 ptsnot available
Underlying volatility140%140%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.8 pts−3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.76%1.30%
LaunchedOct 27, 2025Sep 9, 2025

NBIG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NBIG returned −42.3% where its own daily promise gave −39.5%, 2.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NBIS's −3.4% implies −6.7%, which makes NBIG look 35.6 points short. 32.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NBIG aims to return +2 times NBIS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NBIS moved at 140% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NEBX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: NEBX returned −42.5% where its own daily promise gave −39.5%, 3.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times NBIS's −3.4% implies −6.7%, which makes NEBX look 35.8 points short. NEBX aims to return +2 times NBIS's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NBIG or NEBX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, NBIG finished 35.6 points from what its multiple implies and NEBX finished 35.8 points from its own, so NBIG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NBIG and NEBX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NBIS, NBIG at +2 times and NEBX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NBIG or NEBX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NBIG’s moved at 140% annualized and NEBX’s at 140%, so NBIG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NBIG or NEBX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NBIG or NEBX?
NBIG charges 0.76% a year and NEBX charges 1.30%, so NBIG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

NBIG against NEBX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, NBIG against NEBX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/NBIG-NEBX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources