Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MYY vs MZZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, MYY finished 1.5 points over and MZZ 2.4 points over.

ProShares Short MidCap400 and ProShares UltraShort MidCap400, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+3.1%MYY returned, 3 months
+5.2%MZZ returned, 3 months
+1.2 ptsMYY from its stated multiple
+1.3 ptsMZZ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: MZZ scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

MYY 45.9MZZ 74.80.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MYY1.2 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MDY −1.9% ×1 implies+1.9%MYY returned+3.1%MDY −1.9% ×1 implies+1.9%MYY returned+3.1%
MZZ1.3 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MDY −1.9% ×2 implies+3.9%MZZ returned+5.2%MDY −1.9% ×2 implies+3.9%MZZ returned+5.2%

Performance, window by window

MYY and MZZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
MYYMZZMYYMZZMYYMZZ
1 month+5.3%+10.2%+4.6%+9.3%+0.7 pts+0.9 pts
3 months+3.1%+5.2%+1.9%+3.9%+1.2 pts+1.3 pts
6 months−8.9%−18.9%−11.6%−23.3%+2.7 pts+4.3 pts
1 year−8.1%−19.5%−13.0%−26.0%+4.9 pts+6.5 pts
3 years−24.4%−52.1%−49.2%−98.4%+24.8 pts+46.2 pts
Since launch−89.4%−99.5%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MYY and MZZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MYY
ProShares Short MidCap400
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400
MZZ
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of the S&P MidCap 400
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return-1x-2x
OnMDYMDY
Segmentus mid capus mid cap
Fund returned, 3 months+3.1%+5.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months−1.9%−1.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+1.9%+3.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.2 pts+1.3 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−8.1%−19.5%
Difference from stated, over that window+4.9 pts+6.5 pts
Underlying volatility12%12%
Expense rationot published0.95%
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

MYY in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MYY returned +3.1% where its own daily promise gave +1.6%, 1.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times MDY's −1.9% implies +1.9%, which makes MYY look 1.2 points over. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MYY aims to return -1 times MDY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MDY moved at 12% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MZZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MZZ returned +5.2% where its own daily promise gave +2.8%, 2.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times MDY's −1.9% implies +3.9%, which makes MZZ look 1.3 points over. 1.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MZZ aims to return -2 times MDY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MYY or MZZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, MYY finished 1.2 points from what its multiple implies and MZZ finished 1.3 points from its own, so MYY came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MYY and MZZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P MidCap 400, MYY at -1 times and MZZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MYY or MZZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MYY’s moved at 12% annualized and MZZ’s at 12%, so MYY has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MYY or MZZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MYY against MZZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MYY against MZZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MYY-MZZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources