Data as of .
MUG vs MUU: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, MUG finished 0.5 points from its stated multiple and MUU 0.1.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MUG | MUU | MUG | MUU | MUG | MUU | |
| 1 month | not published | +10.2% | not published | +14.0% | not published | −3.9 pts |
| 3 months | not published | −24.2% | not published | −1.3% | not published | −22.9 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +217.5% | not published | not meaningful | not published | not meaningful |
| 1 year | not published | +1838.1% | not published | not meaningful | not published | not meaningful |
| Since launch | +8.3% | +2389.1% | +8.1% | not meaningful | +0.2 pts | not meaningful |
| MUG Leverage Shares 2X Long MU Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of MU | MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of MU | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Leverage Shares | Direxion |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | MU | MU |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | +8.3% | −24.2% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +4.1% | −0.6% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +8.1% | −1.3% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | +0.2 pts | −22.9 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | +8.3% | +1838.1% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | +0.2 pts | not available |
| Underlying volatility | 48% | 94% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −0.5 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.01% |
| Launched | Aug 19, 2026 | Oct 10, 2024 |
MUG in plain words
Since launch to Sep 11, 2026: MUG returned +8.3% where its own daily promise gave +6.7%, 1.6 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MU's 4.1% implies +8.1%, which makes MUG look 0.2 points over. 1.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MUG aims to return +2 times MU's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MU moved at 48% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
MUU in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MUU returned −24.2% where its own daily promise gave −20.1%, 4.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MU's −0.6% implies −1.3%, which makes MUU look 22.9 points short. 18.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MUU aims to return +2 times MU's move each day, then resets. MU moved at 94% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Are MUG and MUU levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on MU, MUG at +2 times and MUU at +2 times the daily move.
- Can I hold MUG or MUU for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, MUG against MUU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MUG-MUU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.