Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

MSFL vs MSFU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, MSFL finished 1.0 points from its stated multiple and MSFU 1.2.

GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF and Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+51.7%MSFL returned, 3 months
+51.4%MSFU returned, 3 months
−2.5 ptsMSFL from its stated multiple
−2.8 ptsMSFU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: MSFL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

MSFL 31.3MSFU 24.60.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

MSFL2.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MSFT +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%MSFL returned+51.7%MSFT +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%MSFL returned+51.7%
MSFU2.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
MSFT +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%MSFU returned+51.4%MSFT +27.1% ×2 implies+54.2%MSFU returned+51.4%

Performance, window by window

MSFL and MSFU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
MSFLMSFUMSFLMSFUMSFLMSFU
1 month+0.7%+0.5%+1.7%+1.7%−1.0 pts−1.2 pts
3 months+51.7%+51.4%+54.2%+54.2%−2.5 pts−2.8 pts
6 months+41.5%+41.5%+51.6%+51.6%−10.1 pts−10.1 pts
1 year−17.6%−18.6%−0.5%−0.5%−17.1 pts−18.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+29.4%not published+105.8%not published−76.3 pts
Since launch−2.9%+73.7%+42.2%+196.9%−45.1 pts−123.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
MSFL and MSFU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Microsoft (MSFT)
MSFU
Direxion Daily MSFT Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Microsoft (MSFT)
IssuerGraniteSharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnMSFTMSFT
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+51.7%+51.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+27.1%+27.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+54.2%+54.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.5 pts−2.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−17.6%−18.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−17.1 pts−18.0 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.0 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio1.15%0.98%
LaunchedMar 18, 2024Sep 7, 2022

MSFL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MSFL returned +51.7% where its own daily promise gave +55.1%, 3.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MSFT's 27.1% implies +54.2%, which makes MSFL look 2.5 points short. 1.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. MSFL aims to return +2 times MSFT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. MSFT moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

MSFU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: MSFU returned +51.4% where its own daily promise gave +55.1%, 3.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times MSFT's 27.1% implies +54.2%, which makes MSFU look 2.8 points short. MSFU aims to return +2 times MSFT's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, MSFL or MSFU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, MSFL finished 2.5 points from what its multiple implies and MSFU finished 2.8 points from its own, so MSFL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are MSFL and MSFU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Microsoft, MSFL at +2 times and MSFU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, MSFL or MSFU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window MSFL’s moved at 43% annualized and MSFU’s at 43%, so MSFL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold MSFL or MSFU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, MSFL or MSFU?
MSFL charges 1.15% a year and MSFU charges 0.98%, so MSFU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

MSFL against MSFU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, MSFL against MSFU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/MSFL-MSFU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources