Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

METG vs METU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, METG finished 1.4 points from its stated multiple and METU 1.2.

Leverage Shares 2X Long META Daily ETF and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+4.1%METG returned, 3 months
+20.9%METU returned, 3 months
−6.4 ptsMETG from its stated multiple
−7.9 ptsMETU from its stated multiple
METG1.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
META +11.9% ×2 implies+23.9%METG returned+22.5%META +11.9% ×2 implies+23.9%METG returned+22.5%
METU7.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
META +14.4% ×2 implies+28.8%METU returned+20.9%META +14.4% ×2 implies+28.8%METU returned+20.9%

Performance, window by window

METG and METU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
METGMETUMETGMETUMETGMETU
1 month+22.5%+22.7%+23.9%+23.9%−1.4 pts−1.2 pts
3 monthsnot published+20.9%not published+28.8%not published−7.9 pts
6 monthsnot published−3.9%not published+11.5%not published−15.4 pts
1 yearnot published−42.6%not published−26.8%not published−15.8 pts
Since launch+4.1%−1.5%+10.5%+63.8%−6.4 pts−65.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
METG and METU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
METG
Leverage Shares 2X Long META Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Meta Platforms (META)
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Meta Platforms (META)
IssuerLeverage SharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnMETAMETA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+22.5%+20.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months+11.9%+14.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+23.9%+28.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.4 pts−7.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+4.1%−42.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−6.4 pts−15.8 pts
Underlying volatility36%47%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.4 pts−1.2 pts
Expense ratio0.75%1.02%
LaunchedJul 7, 2026Jun 5, 2024

METG in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: METG returned +22.5% where its own daily promise gave +23.9%, 1.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times META's 11.9% implies +23.9%, which makes METG look 1.4 points short. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. METG aims to return +2 times META's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. META moved at 36% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

METU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: METU returned +20.9% where its own daily promise gave +24.0%, 3.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times META's 14.4% implies +28.8%, which makes METU look 7.9 points short. 4.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. METU aims to return +2 times META's move each day, then resets. META moved at 47% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, METG or METU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, METG finished 1.4 points from what its multiple implies and METU finished 7.9 points from its own, so METG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are METG and METU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Meta Platforms, METG at +2 times and METU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, METG or METU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window METG’s moved at 36% annualized and METU’s at 47%, so METU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold METG or METU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, METG or METU?
METG charges 0.75% a year and METU charges 1.02%, so METG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

METG against METU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, METG against METU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/METG-METU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources