Which came closer to its stated multiple, LRCC or LRCU?

Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, LRCC finished 1.9 points from what its multiple implies and LRCU finished 7.2 points from its own, so LRCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are LRCC and LRCU levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on LRCX, LRCC at +2 times and LRCU at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, LRCC or LRCU?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LRCC’s moved at 51% annualized and LRCU’s at 80%, so LRCU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold LRCC or LRCU for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of Sep 11, 2026.

LRCC vs LRCU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, LRCC finished 1.9 points from its stated multiple and LRCU 2.0.

Corgi LRCX 2x Daily ETF and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−24.4%LRCC returned, 3 months

−44.5%LRCU returned, 3 months

−7.3 ptsLRCC from its stated multiple

−7.2 ptsLRCU from its stated multiple

LRCC1.9 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026

LRCU7.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026

Performance, window by window

LRCC and LRCU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
Window	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	LRCC	LRCU	LRCC	LRCU	LRCC	LRCU
1 month	−19.0%	−19.1%	−17.1%	−17.1%	−1.9 pts	−2.0 pts
3 months	not published	−44.5%	not published	−37.3%	not published	−7.2 pts
6 months	not published	+46.0%	not published	+81.3%	not published	−35.3 pts
1 year	not published	+310.5%	not published	not meaningful	not published	not meaningful
Since launch	−24.4%	+436.6%	−17.1%	not meaningful	−7.3 pts	not meaningful

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

LRCC and LRCU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	LRCC Corgi LRCX 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of LRCX	LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of LRCX
Issuer	Corgi	Tradr
Sets out to return	+2x	+2x
On	LRCX	LRCX
Segment	company	company
Fund returned, 3 months	−19.0%	−44.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months	−8.6%	−18.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months	−17.1%	−37.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months	−1.9 pts	−7.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch	−24.4%	+310.5%
Difference from stated, over that window	−7.3 pts	not available
Underlying volatility	51%	80%
Difference over the days both have traded	−1.9 pts	−2.0 pts
Expense ratio	not published	1.30%
Launched	Jul 7, 2026	Aug 19, 2025

LRCC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: LRCC returned −19.0% where its own daily promise gave −18.3%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times LRCX's −8.6% implies −17.1%, which makes LRCC look 1.9 points short. 1.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LRCC aims to return +2 times LRCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. LRCX moved at 51% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

LRCU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: LRCU returned −44.5% where its own daily promise gave −43.4%, 1.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times LRCX's −18.6% implies −37.3%, which makes LRCU look 7.2 points short. 6.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LRCU aims to return +2 times LRCX's move each day, then resets. LRCX moved at 80% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, LRCC or LRCU?: Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, LRCC finished 1.9 points from what its multiple implies and LRCU finished 7.2 points from its own, so LRCC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are LRCC and LRCU levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on LRCX, LRCC at +2 times and LRCU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, LRCC or LRCU?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LRCC’s moved at 51% annualized and LRCU’s at 80%, so LRCU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold LRCC or LRCU for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LRCC against LRCU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LRCC against LRCU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/LRCC-LRCU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources