Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LOFD vs SPAX: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, LOFD finished 5.3 points over and SPAX 1.3 points short.

Direxion Daily SpaceX Bear 2X ETF and T-REX 2X Long SpaceX Daily Target ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−48.3%LOFD returned, 3 months
−50.3%SPAX returned, 3 months
+14.9 ptsLOFD from its stated multiple
−7.4 ptsSPAX from its stated multiple
LOFD1.4 pts over its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%LOFD returned−5.6%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies−6.9%LOFD returned−5.6%
SPAX2.7 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPAX returned+4.2%SPCX +3.5% ×2 implies+6.9%SPAX returned+4.2%

Performance, window by window

LOFD and SPAX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
LOFDSPAXLOFDSPAXLOFDSPAX
1 month−5.6%+4.2%−6.9%+6.9%+1.4 pts−2.7 pts
Since launch−48.3%−50.3%−63.2%−42.9%+14.9 pts−7.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LOFD and SPAX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LOFD
Direxion Daily SpaceX Bear 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
SPAX
T-REX 2X Long SpaceX Daily Target ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)
IssuerDirexionT-REX
Sets out to return-2x+2x
OnSPCXSPCX
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−5.6%+4.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.5%+3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.9%+6.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+1.4 pts−2.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−48.3%−50.3%
Difference from stated, over that window+14.9 pts−7.4 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded+1.4 pts−2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.97%1.50%
LaunchedAug 6, 2026Jun 15, 2026

LOFD in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: LOFD returned −5.6% where its own daily promise gave −10.8%, 5.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies −6.9%, which makes LOFD look 1.4 points over. 3.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LOFD aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPAX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: SPAX returned +4.2% where its own daily promise gave +5.5%, 1.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times SPCX's 3.5% implies +6.9%, which makes SPAX look 2.7 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPAX aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, LOFD or SPAX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, LOFD finished 1.4 points from what its multiple implies and SPAX finished 2.7 points from its own, so LOFD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are LOFD and SPAX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, LOFD at -2 times and SPAX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, LOFD or SPAX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LOFD’s moved at 43% annualized and SPAX’s at 43%, so LOFD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold LOFD or SPAX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, LOFD or SPAX?
LOFD charges 0.97% a year and SPAX charges 1.50%, so LOFD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LOFD against SPAX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LOFD against SPAX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/LOFD-SPAX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources