Data as of .
LITC vs LITX: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, LITC finished 6.5 points from its stated multiple and LITX 6.3.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITC | LITX | LITC | LITX | LITC | LITX | |
| 1 month | −7.6% | −7.5% | −1.2% | −1.2% | −6.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 months | not published | −22.1% | not published | +1.2% | not published | −23.3 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +29.8% | not published | +97.8% | not published | −68.1 pts |
| Since launch | +11.1% | +213.6% | +31.2% | not meaningful | −20.1 pts | not meaningful |
| LITC Corgi LITE 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of LITE | LITX Tradr 2X Long LITE Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of LITE | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | Tradr |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | LITE | LITE |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −7.6% | −22.1% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −0.6% | +0.6% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −1.2% | +1.2% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −6.5 pts | −23.3 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | +11.1% | +213.6% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −20.1 pts | not available |
| Underlying volatility | 84% | 97% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −6.5 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 1.49% |
| Launched | Jul 10, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 |
LITC in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: LITC returned −7.6% where its own daily promise gave −6.9%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times LITE's −0.6% implies −1.2%, which makes LITC look 6.5 points short. 5.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LITC aims to return +2 times LITE's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. LITE moved at 84% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
LITX in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: LITX returned −22.1% where its own daily promise gave −19.5%, 2.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times LITE's 0.6% implies +1.2%, which makes LITX look 23.3 points short. 20.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LITX aims to return +2 times LITE's move each day, then resets. LITE moved at 97% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, LITC or LITX?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, LITC finished 6.5 points from what its multiple implies and LITX finished 23.3 points from its own, so LITC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are LITC and LITX levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on LITE, LITC at +2 times and LITX at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, LITC or LITX?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LITC’s moved at 84% annualized and LITX’s at 97%, so LITX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold LITC or LITX for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, LITC against LITX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/LITC-LITX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.