Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

KEYG vs KEYX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, KEYG finished 1.9 points from its stated multiple and KEYX 1.5.

Leverage Shares 2X Long KEYS Daily ETF and Corgi KEYS 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−14.9%KEYG returned, 3 months
−13.6%KEYX returned, 3 months
−8.3 ptsKEYG from its stated multiple
−6.4 ptsKEYX from its stated multiple
KEYG1.9 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
KEYS −4.5% ×2 implies−8.9%KEYG returned−10.8%KEYS −4.5% ×2 implies−8.9%KEYG returned−10.8%
KEYX1.5 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
KEYS −4.5% ×2 implies−8.9%KEYX returned−10.5%KEYS −4.5% ×2 implies−8.9%KEYX returned−10.5%

Performance, window by window

KEYG and KEYX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
KEYGKEYXKEYGKEYXKEYGKEYX
1 month−10.8%−10.5%−8.9%−8.9%−1.9 pts−1.5 pts
Since launch−14.9%−13.6%−6.7%−7.2%−8.3 pts−6.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KEYG and KEYX on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KEYG
Leverage Shares 2X Long KEYS Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of KEYS
KEYX
Corgi KEYS 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of KEYS
IssuerLeverage SharesCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnKEYSKEYS
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−10.8%−10.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months−4.5%−4.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−8.9%−8.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.9 pts−1.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−14.9%−13.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−8.3 pts−6.4 pts
Underlying volatility38%38%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.9 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.99%0.45%
LaunchedJun 16, 2026Jun 24, 2026

KEYG in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: KEYG returned −10.8% where its own daily promise gave −9.9%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times KEYS's −4.5% implies −8.9%, which makes KEYG look 1.9 points short. 1.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. KEYG aims to return +2 times KEYS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. KEYS moved at 38% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

KEYX in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: KEYX returned −10.5% where its own daily promise gave −9.9%, 0.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times KEYS's −4.5% implies −8.9%, which makes KEYX look 1.5 points short. KEYX aims to return +2 times KEYS's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, KEYG or KEYX?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, KEYG finished 1.9 points from what its multiple implies and KEYX finished 1.5 points from its own, so KEYX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are KEYG and KEYX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on KEYS, KEYG at +2 times and KEYX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, KEYG or KEYX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window KEYG’s moved at 38% annualized and KEYX’s at 38%, so KEYG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold KEYG or KEYX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, KEYG or KEYX?
KEYG charges 0.99% a year and KEYX charges 0.45%, so KEYX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KEYG against KEYX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KEYG against KEYX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/KEYG-KEYX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources