Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IONX vs IONZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, IONX finished 2.8 points short and IONZ 25.4 points short.

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−68.4%IONX returned, 3 months
+26.7%IONZ returned, 3 months
+4.5 ptsIONX from its stated multiple
−46.2 ptsIONZ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: IONX scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

IONX 41.9IONZ 0.40.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IONX4.5 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IONQ −36.5% ×2 implies−72.9%IONX returned−68.4%IONQ −36.5% ×2 implies−72.9%IONX returned−68.4%
IONZ46.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IONQ −36.5% ×2 implies+72.9%IONZ returned+26.7%IONQ −36.5% ×2 implies+72.9%IONZ returned+26.7%

Performance, window by window

IONX and IONZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
IONXIONZIONXIONZIONXIONZ
1 month−38.3%+23.7%−37.4%+37.4%−0.9 pts−13.7 pts
3 months−68.4%+26.7%−72.9%+72.9%+4.5 pts−46.2 pts
6 months−30.1%−85.2%+22.9%−22.9%−52.9 pts−62.3 pts
1 year−81.3%−95.3%−43.8%+43.8%−37.5 pts−139.0 pts
Since launch−49.1%−97.5%+136.8%+20.1%−186.0 pts−117.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IONX and IONZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IONX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long IONQ ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of IONQ
IONZ
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short IONQ ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of IONQ
IssuerDefianceDefiance
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnIONQIONQ
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−68.4%+26.7%
Underlying returned, 3 months−36.5%−36.5%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−72.9%+72.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months+4.5 pts−46.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−81.3%−95.3%
Difference from stated, over that window−37.5 pts−139.0 pts
Underlying volatility80%80%
Difference over the days both have traded−0.9 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio1.38%1.91%
LaunchedMar 12, 2025Jun 24, 2025

IONX in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: IONX returned −68.4% where its own daily promise gave −65.6%, 2.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times IONQ's −36.5% implies −72.9%, which makes IONX look 4.5 points over. 7.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. IONX aims to return +2 times IONQ's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IONQ moved at 80% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

IONZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: IONZ returned +26.7% where its own daily promise gave +52.1%, 25.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IONQ's −36.5% implies +72.9%, which makes IONZ look 46.2 points short. 20.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. IONZ aims to return -2 times IONQ's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, IONX or IONZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, IONX finished 4.5 points from what its multiple implies and IONZ finished 46.2 points from its own, so IONX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are IONX and IONZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on IONQ, IONX at +2 times and IONZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, IONX or IONZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window IONX’s moved at 80% annualized and IONZ’s at 80%, so IONX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold IONX or IONZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, IONX or IONZ?
IONX charges 1.38% a year and IONZ charges 1.91%, so IONX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IONX against IONZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IONX against IONZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/IONX-IONZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources