Data as of .
INT vs INTW: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, INT finished 3.5 points from its stated multiple and INTW 4.0.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INT | INTW | INT | INTW | INT | INTW | |
| 1 month | +0.5% | −0.1% | +3.9% | +3.9% | −3.5 pts | −4.0 pts |
| 3 months | not published | −43.1% | not published | −34.7% | not published | −8.4 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +233.4% | not published | not meaningful | not published | not meaningful |
| 1 year | not published | +757.1% | not published | not meaningful | not published | not meaningful |
| Since launch | −21.2% | +565.1% | −12.6% | not meaningful | −8.6 pts | not meaningful |
| INT Corgi INTC 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of INTC | INTW GraniteShares 2x Long INTC Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of INTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | GraniteShares |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | INTC | INTC |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | +0.5% | −43.1% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +2.0% | −17.4% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +3.9% | −34.7% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −3.5 pts | −8.4 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −21.2% | +757.1% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −8.6 pts | not available |
| Underlying volatility | 57% | 76% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −3.5 pts | −4.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 1.50% |
| Launched | Jul 10, 2026 | Feb 13, 2025 |
INT in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: INT returned +0.5% where its own daily promise gave +1.3%, 0.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times INTC's 2.0% implies +3.9%, which makes INT look 3.5 points short. 2.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. INT aims to return +2 times INTC's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. INTC moved at 57% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
INTW in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: INTW returned −43.1% where its own daily promise gave −40.8%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times INTC's −17.4% implies −34.7%, which makes INTW look 8.4 points short. 6.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. INTW aims to return +2 times INTC's move each day, then resets. INTC moved at 76% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, INT or INTW?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, INT finished 3.5 points from what its multiple implies and INTW finished 8.4 points from its own, so INT came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are INT and INTW levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on INTC, INT at +2 times and INTW at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, INT or INTW?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window INT’s moved at 57% annualized and INTW’s at 76%, so INTW has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold INT or INTW for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, INT or INTW?
- INT charges 0.45% a year and INTW charges 1.50%, so INT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, INT against INTW, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/INT-INTW Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.