Which came closer to its stated multiple, HIMC or HIMZ?

Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, HIMC finished 4.1 points from what its multiple implies and HIMZ finished 26.7 points from its own, so HIMC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are HIMC and HIMZ levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on HIMS, HIMC at +2 times and HIMZ at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, HIMC or HIMZ?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window HIMC’s moved at 79% annualized and HIMZ’s at 90%, so HIMZ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold HIMC or HIMZ for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of Sep 11, 2026.

HIMC vs HIMZ: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, HIMC finished 4.1 points from its stated multiple and HIMZ 6.1.

Corgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−49.0%HIMC returned, 3 months

−21.6%HIMZ returned, 3 months

−5.5 ptsHIMC from its stated multiple

−26.7 ptsHIMZ from its stated multiple

HIMC4.1 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026

HIMZ26.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026

Performance, window by window

HIMC and HIMZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
Window	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	HIMC	HIMZ	HIMC	HIMZ	HIMC	HIMZ
1 month	−20.5%	−22.5%	−16.4%	−16.4%	−4.1 pts	−6.1 pts
3 months	not published	−21.6%	not published	+5.1%	not published	−26.7 pts
6 months	not published	−30.1%	not published	+22.1%	not published	−52.2 pts
1 year	not published	−91.0%	not published	−93.7%	not published	+2.7 pts
Since launch	−49.0%	−89.6%	−43.5%	−25.6%	−5.5 pts	−64.0 pts

Open the live comparison on ETFIQ

HIMC and HIMZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	HIMC Corgi HIMS 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of HIMS	HIMZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of HIMS
Issuer	Corgi	Defiance
Sets out to return	+2x	+2x
On	HIMS	HIMS
Segment	company	company
Fund returned, 3 months	−20.5%	−21.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months	−8.2%	+2.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months	−16.4%	+5.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months	−4.1 pts	−26.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch	−49.0%	−91.0%
Difference from stated, over that window	−5.5 pts	+2.7 pts
Underlying volatility	79%	90%
Difference over the days both have traded	−4.1 pts	−6.1 pts
Expense ratio	not published	1.33%
Launched	Jul 14, 2026	Mar 13, 2025

HIMC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: HIMC returned −20.5% where its own daily promise gave −20.0%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times HIMS's −8.2% implies −16.4%, which makes HIMC look 4.1 points short. 3.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. HIMC aims to return +2 times HIMS's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. HIMS moved at 79% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

HIMZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: HIMZ returned −21.6% where its own daily promise gave −14.3%, 7.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times HIMS's 2.6% implies +5.1%, which makes HIMZ look 26.7 points short. 19.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. HIMZ aims to return +2 times HIMS's move each day, then resets. HIMS moved at 90% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, HIMC or HIMZ?: Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, HIMC finished 4.1 points from what its multiple implies and HIMZ finished 26.7 points from its own, so HIMC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are HIMC and HIMZ levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on HIMS, HIMC at +2 times and HIMZ at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, HIMC or HIMZ?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window HIMC’s moved at 79% annualized and HIMZ’s at 90%, so HIMZ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold HIMC or HIMZ for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

HIMC against HIMZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, HIMC against HIMZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/HIMC-HIMZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources