Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLL vs SHNY: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, GLL finished 2.5 points over and SHNY 5.4 points short.

ProShares UltraShort Gold and MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−7.8%GLL returned, 3 months
−0.5%SHNY returned, 3 months
−1.5 ptsGLL from its stated multiple
−10.0 ptsSHNY from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: GLL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

GLL 77.3SHNY 10.60.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GLL1.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLD +3.2% ×2 implies−6.3%GLL returned−7.8%GLD +3.2% ×2 implies−6.3%GLL returned−7.8%
SHNY10 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GLD +3.2% ×3 implies+9.5%SHNY returned−0.5%GLD +3.2% ×3 implies+9.5%SHNY returned−0.5%

Performance, window by window

GLL and SHNY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
GLLSHNYGLLSHNYGLLSHNY
1 month+2.7%−7.8%+3.0%−4.6%−0.3 pts−3.3 pts
3 months−7.8%−0.5%−6.3%+9.5%−1.5 pts−10.0 pts
6 months+26.5%−47.5%+26.9%−40.4%−0.4 pts−7.1 pts
1 year−38.8%+5.4%−38.2%+57.4%−0.6 pts−52.0 pts
3 years−80.9%+286.1%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Since launch−97.1%+278.9%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLL and SHNY on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of gold (GLD)
SHNY
MicroSectors Gold 3X Leveraged ETNs due January 29, 2043
Aims to return three times the daily move of gold (GLD)
IssuerProSharesMicroSectors
Sets out to return-2x+3x
OnGLDGLD
Segmentmetalindex
Fund returned, 3 months−7.8%−0.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.2%+3.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−6.3%+9.5%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.5 pts−10.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−38.8%+5.4%
Difference from stated, over that window−0.6 pts−52.0 pts
Underlying volatility25%25%
Expense rationot publishednot published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Feb 22, 2023

GLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: GLL returned −7.8% where its own daily promise gave −10.3%, 2.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times GLD's 3.2% implies −6.3%, which makes GLL look 1.5 points short. 4.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GLL aims to return -2 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GLD moved at 25% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SHNY in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SHNY returned −0.5% where its own daily promise gave +4.8%, 5.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times GLD's 3.2% implies +9.5%, which makes SHNY look 10.0 points short. 4.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SHNY aims to return +3 times GLD's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, GLL or SHNY?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, GLL finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and SHNY finished 10.0 points from its own, so GLL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are GLL and SHNY levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on gold, GLL at -2 times and SHNY at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, GLL or SHNY?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window GLL’s moved at 25% annualized and SHNY’s at 25%, so GLL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold GLL or SHNY for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLL against SHNY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLL against SHNY, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/GLL-SHNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources