Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GGLS vs GOU: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, GGLS finished 1.4 points over and GOU 2.2 points short.

Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+4.3%GGLS returned, 3 months
−16.3%GOU returned, 3 months
−1.6 ptsGGLS from its stated multiple
−4.7 ptsGOU from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: GOU scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

GGLS 43GOU 65.50.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GGLS1.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GOOGL −5.8% ×1 implies+5.8%GGLS returned+4.3%GOOGL −5.8% ×1 implies+5.8%GGLS returned+4.3%
GOU4.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
GOOGL −5.8% ×2 implies−11.7%GOU returned−16.3%GOOGL −5.8% ×2 implies−11.7%GOU returned−16.3%

Performance, window by window

GGLS and GOU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
GGLSGOUGGLSGOUGGLSGOU
1 month+1.6%−3.5%+1.4%−2.8%+0.1 pts−0.7 pts
3 months+4.3%−16.3%+5.8%−11.7%−1.6 pts−4.7 pts
6 months−14.0%+11.8%−12.1%+24.2%−1.9 pts−12.4 pts
1 year−32.4%not published−41.2%not published+8.8 ptsnot published
3 years−63.5%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch−72.0%−2.1%not meaningful+14.9%not meaningful−17.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GGLS and GOU on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GGLS
Direxion Daily GOOGL Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Alphabet (GOOGL)
GOU
GraniteShares 2x Long GOOGL Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Alphabet (GOOGL)
IssuerDirexionGraniteShares
Sets out to return-1x+2x
OnGOOGLGOOGL
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+4.3%−16.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months−5.8%−5.8%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+5.8%−11.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.6 pts−4.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−32.4%−2.1%
Difference from stated, over that window+8.8 pts−17.0 pts
Underlying volatility36%36%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−0.7 pts
Expense rationot published1.15%
LaunchedSep 7, 2022Dec 2, 2025

GGLS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: GGLS returned +4.3% where its own daily promise gave +2.8%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times GOOGL's −5.8% implies +5.8%, which makes GGLS look 1.6 points short. 3.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GGLS aims to return -1 times GOOGL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. GOOGL moved at 36% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

GOU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: GOU returned −16.3% where its own daily promise gave −14.2%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times GOOGL's −5.8% implies −11.7%, which makes GOU look 4.7 points short. 2.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. GOU aims to return +2 times GOOGL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, GGLS or GOU?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, GGLS finished 1.6 points from what its multiple implies and GOU finished 4.7 points from its own, so GGLS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are GGLS and GOU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Alphabet, GGLS at -1 times and GOU at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, GGLS or GOU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window GGLS’s moved at 36% annualized and GOU’s at 36%, so GGLS has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold GGLS or GOU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GGLS against GOU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GGLS against GOU, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/GGLS-GOU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources