Data as of .
FBX vs METD: which held to its multiple?
Over a month against its own daily promise, FBX finished 1.4 points short and METD 0.6 points over.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBX | METD | FBX | METD | FBX | METD | |
| 1 month | +22.6% | −11.1% | +23.9% | −11.9% | −1.3 pts | +0.8 pts |
| 3 months | not published | −16.1% | not published | −14.4% | not published | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −11.7% | not published | −5.8% | not published | −5.9 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.8% | not published | +13.4% | not published | −7.6 pts |
| Since launch | +23.2% | −34.8% | +30.1% | −31.9% | −6.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| FBX Corgi META 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of Meta Platforms (META) | METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Meta Platforms (META) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | Direxion |
| Sets out to return | +2x | -1x |
| On | META | META |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | +22.6% | −16.1% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | +11.9% | +14.4% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +23.9% | −14.4% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −1.3 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | +23.2% | +5.8% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −6.9 pts | −7.6 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 36% | 47% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −1.3 pts | no shared window |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | not published |
| Launched | Jun 30, 2026 | Jun 5, 2024 |
FBX in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: FBX returned +22.6% where its own daily promise gave +23.9%, 1.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times META's 11.9% implies +23.9%, which makes FBX look 1.3 points short. 0.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. FBX aims to return +2 times META's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. META moved at 36% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
METD in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: METD returned −16.1% where its own daily promise gave −17.2%, 1.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times META's 14.4% implies −14.4%, which makes METD look 1.6 points short. 2.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. METD aims to return -1 times META's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. META moved at 47% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, FBX or METD?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, FBX finished 1.3 points from what its multiple implies and METD finished 1.6 points from its own, so FBX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are FBX and METD levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Meta Platforms, FBX at +2 times and METD at -1 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, FBX or METD?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window FBX’s moved at 36% annualized and METD’s at 47%, so METD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold FBX or METD for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBX against METD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/FBX-METD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.