Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ETU vs SETH: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, ETU finished 6.3 points short and SETH 0.9 points over.

T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF and ProShares Short Ether ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+112.2%ETU returned, 3 months
−37.8%SETH returned, 3 months
+7.3 ptsETU from its stated multiple
+14.6 ptsSETH from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SETH scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

ETU 7.3SETH 25.20.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ETU7.3 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ETHA +52.4% ×2 implies+104.9%ETU returned+112.2%ETHA +52.4% ×2 implies+104.9%ETU returned+112.2%
SETH14.6 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ETHA +52.4% ×1 implies−52.4%SETH returned−37.8%ETHA +52.4% ×1 implies−52.4%SETH returned−37.8%

Performance, window by window

ETU and SETH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
ETUSETHETUSETHETUSETH
1 month+77.2%−28.0%+70.6%−35.3%+6.6 pts+7.3 pts
3 months+112.2%−37.8%+104.9%−52.4%+7.3 pts+14.6 pts
6 months+19.5%−25.8%+41.2%−20.6%−21.6 pts−5.2 pts
1 year−81.5%+22.4%−85.6%+42.8%+4.1 pts−20.4 pts
Since launch−71.3%−43.0%−0.9%+27.0%−70.4 pts−70.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ETU and SETH on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ETU
T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of ether (ETHA)
SETH
ProShares Short Ether ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of ether (ETHA)
IssuerT-REXProShares
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnETHAETHA
Segmentcryptocrypto
Fund returned, 3 months+112.2%−37.8%
Underlying returned, 3 months+52.4%+52.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+104.9%−52.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months+7.3 pts+14.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−81.5%+22.4%
Difference from stated, over that window+4.1 pts−20.4 pts
Underlying volatility51%51%
Difference over the days both have traded+7.3 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedOct 24, 2024Nov 2, 2023

ETU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ETU returned +112.2% where its own daily promise gave +118.5%, 6.3 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ETHA's 52.4% implies +104.9%, which makes ETU look 7.3 points over. 13.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ETU aims to return +2 times ETHA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ETHA moved at 51% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SETH in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SETH returned −37.8% where its own daily promise gave −38.7%, 0.9 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times ETHA's 52.4% implies −52.4%, which makes SETH look 14.6 points over. 13.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SETH aims to return -1 times ETHA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ETU or SETH?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ETU finished 7.3 points from what its multiple implies and SETH finished 14.6 points from its own, so ETU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ETU and SETH levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ether, ETU at +2 times and SETH at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ETU or SETH?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ETU’s moved at 51% annualized and SETH’s at 51%, so ETU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ETU or SETH for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ETU against SETH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ETU against SETH, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ETU-SETH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources