Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

EFO vs EFZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, EFO finished 1.5 points short and EFZ 1.3 points over.

ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE and ProShares Short MSCI EAFE, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+4.5%EFO returned, 3 months
−2.2%EFZ returned, 3 months
−1.9 ptsEFO from its stated multiple
+1.0 ptsEFZ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: EFO scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

EFO 87.1EFZ 35.10.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

EFO1.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EFA +3.2% ×2 implies+6.4%EFO returned+4.5%EFA +3.2% ×2 implies+6.4%EFO returned+4.5%
EFZ1 pt over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EFA +3.2% ×1 implies−3.2%EFZ returned−2.2%EFA +3.2% ×1 implies−3.2%EFZ returned−2.2%

Performance, window by window

EFO and EFZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
EFOEFZEFOEFZEFOEFZ
1 month−3.7%+2.4%−3.3%+1.7%−0.4 pts+0.7 pts
3 months+4.5%−2.2%+6.4%−3.2%−1.9 pts+1.0 pts
6 months+20.8%−10.1%+25.1%−12.5%−4.3 pts+2.4 pts
1 year+28.5%−12.8%+36.4%−18.2%−7.9 pts+5.4 pts
3 years+108.0%−30.5%+131.1%−65.5%−23.1 pts+35.1 pts
Since launch+198.5%−76.2%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
EFO and EFZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFO
ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
Aims to return twice the daily move of developed markets outside the US (EFA)
EFZ
ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of developed markets outside the US (EFA)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnEFAEFA
Segmentsectorsector
Fund returned, 3 months+4.5%−2.2%
Underlying returned, 3 months+3.2%+3.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+6.4%−3.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−1.9 pts+1.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+28.5%−12.8%
Difference from stated, over that window−7.9 pts+5.4 pts
Underlying volatility13%13%
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

EFO in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: EFO returned +4.5% where its own daily promise gave +6.1%, 1.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times EFA's 3.2% implies +6.4%, which makes EFO look 1.9 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EFO aims to return +2 times EFA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EFA moved at 13% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

EFZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: EFZ returned −2.2% where its own daily promise gave −3.5%, 1.3 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times EFA's 3.2% implies −3.2%, which makes EFZ look 1.0 points over. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EFZ aims to return -1 times EFA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, EFO or EFZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, EFO finished 1.9 points from what its multiple implies and EFZ finished 1.0 points from its own, so EFZ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are EFO and EFZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on developed markets outside the US, EFO at +2 times and EFZ at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, EFO or EFZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EFO’s moved at 13% annualized and EFZ’s at 13%, so EFO has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold EFO or EFZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFO against EFZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFO against EFZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/EFO-EFZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources