Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

EET vs EUM: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, EET finished 0.9 points short and EUM 1.4 points over.

ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets and ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−1.9%EET returned, 3 months
−1.0%EUM returned, 3 months
−2.8 ptsEET from its stated multiple
−0.5 ptsEUM from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: EET scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

EET 96.8EUM 37.60.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

EET2.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EEM +0.4% ×2 implies+0.9%EET returned−1.9%EEM +0.4% ×2 implies+0.9%EET returned−1.9%
EUMOn its stated multiple · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EEM +0.4% ×1 implies−0.4%EUM returned−1.0%EEM +0.4% ×1 implies−0.4%EUM returned−1.0%

Performance, window by window

EET and EUM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
EETEUMEETEUMEETEUM
1 month+3.5%−1.8%+4.2%−2.1%−0.7 pts+0.3 pts
3 months−1.9%−1.0%+0.9%−0.4%−2.8 pts−0.5 pts
6 months+34.0%−18.2%+40.1%−20.0%−6.1 pts+1.9 pts
1 year+54.8%−24.5%+64.5%−32.3%−9.7 pts+7.8 pts
3 years+151.7%−41.4%+173.1%−86.5%−21.3 pts+45.1 pts
Since launch+35.5%−75.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
EET and EUM on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
Aims to return twice the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnEEMEEM
Segmentcountrycountry
Fund returned, 3 months−1.9%−1.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months+0.4%+0.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+0.9%−0.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.8 pts−0.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+54.8%−24.5%
Difference from stated, over that window−9.7 pts+7.8 pts
Underlying volatility28%28%
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

EET in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: EET returned −1.9% where its own daily promise gave −1.0%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times EEM's 0.4% implies +0.9%, which makes EET look 2.8 points short. 1.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EET aims to return +2 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EEM moved at 28% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

EUM in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: EUM returned −1.0% where its own daily promise gave −2.3%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times EEM's 0.4% implies −0.4%, which makes EUM look 0.5 points short. 1.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EUM aims to return -1 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, EET or EUM?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, EET finished 2.8 points from what its multiple implies and EUM finished 0.5 points from its own, so EUM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are EET and EUM levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on emerging markets, EET at +2 times and EUM at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, EET or EUM?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EET’s moved at 28% annualized and EUM’s at 28%, so EET has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold EET or EUM for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EET against EUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EET against EUM, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/EET-EUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources