Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

EDC vs EUM: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, EDC finished 2.5 points short and EUM 1.4 points over.

Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−6.9%EDC returned, 3 months
−1.0%EUM returned, 3 months
−8.2 ptsEDC from its stated multiple
−0.5 ptsEUM from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: EDC scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

EDC 51.7EUM 37.60.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

EDC8.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EEM +0.4% ×3 implies+1.3%EDC returned−6.9%EEM +0.4% ×3 implies+1.3%EDC returned−6.9%
EUMOn its stated multiple · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EEM +0.4% ×1 implies−0.4%EUM returned−1.0%EEM +0.4% ×1 implies−0.4%EUM returned−1.0%

Performance, window by window

EDC and EUM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
EDCEUMEDCEUMEDCEUM
1 month+4.6%−1.8%+6.2%−2.1%−1.6 pts+0.3 pts
3 months−6.9%−1.0%+1.3%−0.4%−8.2 pts−0.5 pts
6 months+42.8%−18.2%+60.1%−20.0%−17.3 pts+1.9 pts
1 year+71.6%−24.5%+96.8%−32.3%−25.3 pts+7.8 pts
3 years+215.9%−41.4%+259.6%−86.5%−43.7 pts+45.1 pts
Since launch−59.7%−75.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
EDC and EUM on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EDC
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF
Aims to return three times the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
EUM
ProShares Short MSCI Emerging Markets
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
IssuerDirexionProShares
Sets out to return+3x-1x
OnEEMEEM
Segmentcountrycountry
Fund returned, 3 months−6.9%−1.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months+0.4%+0.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+1.3%−0.4%
Difference from stated, 3 months−8.2 pts−0.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+71.6%−24.5%
Difference from stated, over that window−25.3 pts+7.8 pts
Underlying volatility28%28%
Expense ratio1.09%not published
LaunchedJan 4, 2010Jan 4, 2010

EDC in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: EDC returned −6.9% where its own daily promise gave −4.4%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +3 times EEM's 0.4% implies +1.3%, which makes EDC look 8.2 points short. 5.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EDC aims to return +3 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EEM moved at 28% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

EUM in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: EUM returned −1.0% where its own daily promise gave −2.3%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times EEM's 0.4% implies −0.4%, which makes EUM look 0.5 points short. 1.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EUM aims to return -1 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, EDC or EUM?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, EDC finished 8.2 points from what its multiple implies and EUM finished 0.5 points from its own, so EUM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are EDC and EUM levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on emerging markets, EDC at +3 times and EUM at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, EDC or EUM?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EDC’s moved at 28% annualized and EUM’s at 28%, so EDC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold EDC or EUM for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EDC against EUM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EDC against EUM, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/EDC-EUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources