Data as of .
CORD vs CRWX: which held to its multiple?
Over a month against its own daily promise, CORD finished 0.5 points over and CRWX 1.5 points short.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORD | CRWX | CORD | CRWX | CORD | CRWX | |
| 1 month | +28.5% | −36.4% | +34.8% | −34.8% | −6.3 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 3 months | −49.6% | not published | +23.0% | not published | −72.6 pts | not published |
| 6 months | −81.4% | not published | −19.4% | not published | −62.0 pts | not published |
| Since launch | −89.3% | −10.1% | +52.1% | +13.1% | −141.4 pts | −23.2 pts |
| CORD T-REX 2X INVERSE CRWV DAILY TARGET ETF Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of CRWV | CRWX Corgi CRWV 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of CRWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | T-REX | Corgi |
| Sets out to return | -2x | +2x |
| On | CRWV | CRWV |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −49.6% | −36.4% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −11.5% | −17.4% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | +23.0% | −34.8% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −72.6 pts | −1.6 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −89.3% | −10.1% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −141.4 pts | −23.2 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 107% | 72% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | no shared window | −1.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 1.50% | 0.45% |
| Launched | Sep 26, 2025 | Jul 7, 2026 |
CORD in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CORD returned −49.6% where its own daily promise gave −49.3%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times CRWV's −11.5% implies +23.0%, which makes CORD look 72.6 points short. 72.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CORD aims to return -2 times CRWV's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRWV moved at 107% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
CRWX in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: CRWX returned −36.4% where its own daily promise gave −34.9%, 1.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CRWV's −17.4% implies −34.8%, which makes CRWX look 1.6 points short. 0.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CRWX aims to return +2 times CRWV's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CRWV moved at 72% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, CORD or CRWX?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CORD finished 72.6 points from what its multiple implies and CRWX finished 1.6 points from its own, so CRWX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are CORD and CRWX levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on CRWV, CORD at -2 times and CRWX at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, CORD or CRWX?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CORD’s moved at 107% annualized and CRWX’s at 72%, so CORD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold CORD or CRWX for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, CORD or CRWX?
- CORD charges 1.50% a year and CRWX charges 0.45%, so CRWX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CORD against CRWX, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CORD-CRWX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.