Data as of .
CIFC vs CIFG: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, CIFC finished 9.3 points from its stated multiple and CIFG 10.7.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIFC | CIFG | CIFC | CIFG | CIFC | CIFG | |
| 1 month | −20.7% | −22.1% | −11.4% | −11.4% | −9.3 pts | −10.7 pts |
| 3 months | not published | −70.0% | not published | −62.4% | not published | −7.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −33.3% | not published | +39.3% | not published | −72.7 pts |
| Since launch | −68.3% | −72.8% | −62.4% | −21.5% | −5.8 pts | −51.3 pts |
| CIFC Corgi CIFR 2x Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of CIFR | CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of CIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Corgi | Leverage Shares |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | CIFR | CIFR |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −20.7% | −70.0% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −5.7% | −31.2% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −11.4% | −62.4% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −9.3 pts | −7.6 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −68.3% | −72.8% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −5.8 pts | −51.3 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 110% | 127% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −9.3 pts | −10.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | not published | 0.75% |
| Launched | Jun 30, 2026 | Dec 11, 2025 |
CIFC in plain words
One month to Sep 11, 2026: CIFC returned −20.7% where its own daily promise gave −20.0%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CIFR's −5.7% implies −11.4%, which makes CIFC look 9.3 points short. 8.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CIFC aims to return +2 times CIFR's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. CIFR moved at 110% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
CIFG in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: CIFG returned −70.0% where its own daily promise gave −68.0%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times CIFR's −31.2% implies −62.4%, which makes CIFG look 7.6 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. CIFG aims to return +2 times CIFR's move each day, then resets. CIFR moved at 127% annualized over that window.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, CIFC or CIFG?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, CIFC finished 9.3 points from what its multiple implies and CIFG finished 7.6 points from its own, so CIFG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are CIFC and CIFG levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on CIFR, CIFC at +2 times and CIFG at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, CIFC or CIFG?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window CIFC’s moved at 110% annualized and CIFG’s at 127%, so CIFG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold CIFC or CIFG for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIFC against CIFG, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/CIFC-CIFG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.