Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BRZU vs UBR: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, BRZU finished 2.0 points from its stated multiple and UBR 2.8.

Direxion Daily MSCI Brazil Bull 2X ETF and ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+17.7%BRZU returned, 3 months
+16.9%UBR returned, 3 months
−2.0 ptsBRZU from its stated multiple
−2.8 ptsUBR from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: BRZU scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

BRZU 85.4UBR 55.40.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BRZU2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EWZ +9.8% ×2 implies+19.7%BRZU returned+17.7%EWZ +9.8% ×2 implies+19.7%BRZU returned+17.7%
UBR2.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
EWZ +9.8% ×2 implies+19.7%UBR returned+16.9%EWZ +9.8% ×2 implies+19.7%UBR returned+16.9%

Performance, window by window

BRZU and UBR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
BRZUUBRBRZUUBRBRZUUBR
1 month+26.3%+25.9%+25.6%+25.6%+0.7 pts+0.3 pts
3 months+17.7%+16.9%+19.7%+19.7%−2.0 pts−2.8 pts
6 months+11.4%+10.6%+17.3%+17.3%−5.9 pts−6.6 pts
1 year+56.7%+55.6%+65.8%+65.8%−9.1 pts−10.2 pts
3 years+46.8%+43.3%+89.3%+89.3%−42.6 pts−46.0 pts
Since launch−99.0%−86.6%+54.5%+42.8%−153.5 pts−129.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BRZU and UBR on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BRZU
Direxion Daily MSCI Brazil Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Brazil (EWZ)
UBR
ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped
Aims to return twice the daily move of Brazil (EWZ)
IssuerDirexionProShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnEWZEWZ
Segmentcountrycountry
Fund returned, 3 months+17.7%+16.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months+9.8%+9.8%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+19.7%+19.7%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.0 pts−2.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+56.7%+55.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−9.1 pts−10.2 pts
Underlying volatility22%22%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.0 pts−2.8 pts
Expense ratio1.32%0.95%
LaunchedApr 10, 2013May 7, 2010

BRZU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: BRZU returned +17.7% where its own daily promise gave +19.3%, 1.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times EWZ's 9.8% implies +19.7%, which makes BRZU look 2.0 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BRZU aims to return +2 times EWZ's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EWZ moved at 22% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UBR in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: UBR returned +16.9% where its own daily promise gave +19.3%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times EWZ's 9.8% implies +19.7%, which makes UBR look 2.8 points short. UBR aims to return +2 times EWZ's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BRZU or UBR?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, BRZU finished 2.0 points from what its multiple implies and UBR finished 2.8 points from its own, so BRZU came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BRZU and UBR levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Brazil, BRZU at +2 times and UBR at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BRZU or UBR?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BRZU’s moved at 22% annualized and UBR’s at 22%, so BRZU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BRZU or UBR for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, BRZU or UBR?
BRZU charges 1.32% a year and UBR charges 0.95%, so UBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BRZU against UBR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BRZU against UBR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/BRZU-UBR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources