Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BITU vs SBIT: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, BITU finished 5.2 points short and SBIT 1.0 points over.

ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF and ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+37.3%BITU returned, 3 months
−38.3%SBIT returned, 3 months
−5.6 ptsBITU from its stated multiple
+4.6 ptsSBIT from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: SBIT scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

BITU 12.4SBIT 260.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BITU5.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IBIT +21.4% ×2 implies+42.9%BITU returned+37.3%IBIT +21.4% ×2 implies+42.9%BITU returned+37.3%
SBIT4.6 pts over its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
IBIT +21.4% ×2 implies−42.9%SBIT returned−38.3%IBIT +21.4% ×2 implies−42.9%SBIT returned−38.3%

Performance, window by window

BITU and SBIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
BITUSBITBITUSBITBITUSBIT
1 month+44.6%−36.3%+43.9%−43.9%+0.7 pts+7.6 pts
3 months+37.3%−38.3%+42.9%−42.9%−5.6 pts+4.6 pts
6 months+2.1%−28.6%+16.8%−16.8%−14.7 pts−11.8 pts
1 year−68.0%+31.5%−65.4%+65.4%−2.6 pts−33.9 pts
Since launch−47.3%−82.3%+32.8%−32.8%−80.1 pts−49.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BITU and SBIT on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BITU
ProShares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of bitcoin (IBIT)
SBIT
ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of bitcoin (IBIT)
IssuerProSharesProShares
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnIBITIBIT
Segmentcryptocrypto
Fund returned, 3 months+37.3%−38.3%
Underlying returned, 3 months+21.4%+21.4%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+42.9%−42.9%
Difference from stated, 3 months−5.6 pts+4.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−68.0%+31.5%
Difference from stated, over that window−2.6 pts−33.9 pts
Underlying volatility38%38%
Difference over the days both have traded−5.6 pts+4.6 pts
Expense ratio0.98%not published
LaunchedApr 2, 2024Apr 2, 2024

BITU in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: BITU returned +37.3% where its own daily promise gave +42.5%, 5.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times IBIT's 21.4% implies +42.9%, which makes BITU look 5.6 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BITU aims to return +2 times IBIT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IBIT moved at 38% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SBIT in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: SBIT returned −38.3% where its own daily promise gave −39.2%, 1.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IBIT's 21.4% implies −42.9%, which makes SBIT look 4.6 points over. 3.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SBIT aims to return -2 times IBIT's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BITU or SBIT?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, BITU finished 5.6 points from what its multiple implies and SBIT finished 4.6 points from its own, so SBIT came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BITU and SBIT levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on bitcoin, BITU at +2 times and SBIT at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BITU or SBIT?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BITU’s moved at 38% annualized and SBIT’s at 38%, so BITU has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BITU or SBIT for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BITU against SBIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BITU against SBIT, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/BITU-SBIT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources