Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BABC vs KBAB: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, BABC finished 0.0 points from its stated multiple and KBAB 0.2.

Corgi BABA 2x Daily ETF and KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−9.5%BABC returned, 3 months
−12.4%KBAB returned, 3 months
−4.1 ptsBABC from its stated multiple
−6.2 ptsKBAB from its stated multiple
BABCOn its stated multiple · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
BABA −12.7% ×2 implies−25.4%BABC returned−25.4%BABA −12.7% ×2 implies−25.4%BABC returned−25.4%
KBAB6.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
BABA −3.1% ×2 implies−6.2%KBAB returned−12.4%BABA −3.1% ×2 implies−6.2%KBAB returned−12.4%

Performance, window by window

BABC and KBAB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
BABCKBABBABCKBABBABCKBAB
1 month−25.4%−25.7%−25.4%−25.4%0.0 pts−0.2 pts
3 monthsnot published−12.4%not published−6.2%not published−6.2 pts
6 monthsnot published−42.4%not published−36.8%not published−5.6 pts
1 yearnot published−62.2%not published−58.1%not published−4.1 pts
Since launch−9.5%−57.5%−5.4%−36.4%−4.1 pts−21.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BABC and KBAB on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BABC
Corgi BABA 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of BABA
KBAB
KraneShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of BABA
IssuerCorgiKraneShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnBABABABA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−25.4%−12.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months−12.7%−3.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−25.4%−6.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months0.0 pts−6.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−9.5%−62.2%
Difference from stated, over that window−4.1 pts−4.1 pts
Underlying volatility39%44%
Difference over the days both have traded0.0 pts−0.2 pts
Expense ratio0.45%0.99%
LaunchedJul 10, 2026Mar 12, 2025

BABC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: BABC returned −25.4% where its own daily promise gave −25.0%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times BABA's −12.7% implies −25.4%, which makes BABC look 0.0 points short. 0.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BABC aims to return +2 times BABA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. BABA moved at 39% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

KBAB in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: KBAB returned −12.4% where its own daily promise gave −10.4%, 2.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times BABA's −3.1% implies −6.2%, which makes KBAB look 6.2 points short. 4.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. KBAB aims to return +2 times BABA's move each day, then resets. BABA moved at 44% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BABC or KBAB?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, BABC finished 0.0 points from what its multiple implies and KBAB finished 6.2 points from its own, so BABC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BABC and KBAB levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on BABA, BABC at +2 times and KBAB at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BABC or KBAB?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BABC’s moved at 39% annualized and KBAB’s at 44%, so KBAB has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BABC or KBAB for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, BABC or KBAB?
BABC charges 0.45% a year and KBAB charges 0.99%, so BABC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BABC against KBAB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BABC against KBAB, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/BABC-KBAB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources