Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AVL vs AVS: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, AVL finished 2.2 points short and AVS 1.7 points over.

Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X ETF and Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−16.1%AVL returned, 3 months
+2.5%AVS returned, 3 months
−5.9 ptsAVL from its stated multiple
−2.6 ptsAVS from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: AVL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

AVL 61.6AVS 56.60.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AVL5.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AVGO −5.1% ×2 implies−10.2%AVL returned−16.1%AVGO −5.1% ×2 implies−10.2%AVL returned−16.1%
AVS2.6 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AVGO −5.1% ×1 implies+5.1%AVS returned+2.5%AVGO −5.1% ×1 implies+5.1%AVS returned+2.5%

Performance, window by window

AVL and AVS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AVLAVSAVLAVSAVLAVS
1 month−25.9%+14.2%−26.0%+13.0%+0.1 pts+1.3 pts
3 months−16.1%+2.5%−10.2%+5.1%−5.9 pts−2.6 pts
6 months+7.2%−18.2%+25.6%−12.8%−18.4 pts−5.5 pts
1 year−25.9%−14.9%+2.8%−1.4%−28.7 pts−13.5 pts
Since launch+89.1%−66.0%+195.9%−98.0%−106.8 pts+31.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AVL and AVS on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Broadcom (AVGO)
AVS
Direxion Daily AVGO Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Broadcom (AVGO)
IssuerDirexionDirexion
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnAVGOAVGO
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−16.1%+2.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months−5.1%−5.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−10.2%+5.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months−5.9 pts−2.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−25.9%−14.9%
Difference from stated, over that window−28.7 pts−13.5 pts
Underlying volatility43%43%
Difference over the days both have traded+0.1 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio1.00%not published
LaunchedOct 10, 2024Oct 10, 2024

AVL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AVL returned −16.1% where its own daily promise gave −13.9%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AVGO's −5.1% implies −10.2%, which makes AVL look 5.9 points short. 3.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AVL aims to return +2 times AVGO's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AVGO moved at 43% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AVS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AVS returned +2.5% where its own daily promise gave +0.8%, 1.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AVGO's −5.1% implies +5.1%, which makes AVS look 2.6 points short. 4.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AVS aims to return -1 times AVGO's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AVL or AVS?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AVL finished 5.9 points from what its multiple implies and AVS finished 2.6 points from its own, so AVS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AVL and AVS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Broadcom, AVL at +2 times and AVS at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AVL or AVS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AVL’s moved at 43% annualized and AVS’s at 43%, so AVL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AVL or AVS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVL against AVS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVL against AVS, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AVL-AVS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources