Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ASMG vs ASMZ: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, ASMG finished 1.6 points from its stated multiple and ASMZ 1.3.

Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF and Corgi ASML 2x Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−24.0%ASMG returned, 3 months
−32.1%ASMZ returned, 3 months
−6.5 ptsASMG from its stated multiple
−3.0 ptsASMZ from its stated multiple
ASMG6.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
ASML −8.7% ×2 implies−17.5%ASMG returned−24.0%ASML −8.7% ×2 implies−17.5%ASMG returned−24.0%
ASMZ1.3 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
ASML −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%ASMZ returned−13.6%ASML −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%ASMZ returned−13.6%

Performance, window by window

ASMG and ASMZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
ASMGASMZASMGASMZASMGASMZ
1 month−13.9%−13.6%−12.3%−12.3%−1.6 pts−1.3 pts
3 months−24.0%not published−17.5%not published−6.5 ptsnot published
6 months+32.5%not published+53.3%not published−20.8 ptsnot published
1 year+222.6%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch+221.4%−32.1%not meaningful−29.0%not meaningful−3.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ASMG and ASMZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ASMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of ASML
ASMZ
Corgi ASML 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of ASML
IssuerLeverage SharesCorgi
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnASMLASML
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−24.0%−13.6%
Underlying returned, 3 months−8.7%−6.2%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−17.5%−12.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−6.5 pts−1.3 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+222.6%−32.1%
Difference from stated, over that windownot available−3.0 pts
Underlying volatility49%32%
Difference over the days both have traded−1.6 pts−1.3 pts
Expense ratio0.77%0.45%
LaunchedJan 14, 2025Jun 30, 2026

ASMG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: ASMG returned −24.0% where its own daily promise gave −21.6%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ASML's −8.7% implies −17.5%, which makes ASMG look 6.5 points short. 4.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASMG aims to return +2 times ASML's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. ASML moved at 49% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ASMZ in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: ASMZ returned −13.6% where its own daily promise gave −12.8%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times ASML's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes ASMZ look 1.3 points short. 0.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ASMZ aims to return +2 times ASML's move each day, then resets. ASML moved at 32% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ASMG or ASMZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, ASMG finished 6.5 points from what its multiple implies and ASMZ finished 1.3 points from its own, so ASMZ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ASMG and ASMZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on ASML, ASMG at +2 times and ASMZ at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ASMG or ASMZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ASMG’s moved at 49% annualized and ASMZ’s at 32%, so ASMG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ASMG or ASMZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, ASMG or ASMZ?
ASMG charges 0.77% a year and ASMZ charges 0.45%, so ASMZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ASMG against ASMZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ASMG against ASMZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/ASMG-ASMZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources