Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AMZD vs AMZZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, AMZD finished 1.2 points over and AMZZ 1.7 points short.

Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−10.2%AMZD returned, 3 months
+9.4%AMZZ returned, 3 months
−2.5 ptsAMZD from its stated multiple
−5.9 ptsAMZZ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: AMZZ scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

AMZD 33.9AMZZ 78.10.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AMZD2.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN +7.6% ×1 implies−7.6%AMZD returned−10.2%AMZN +7.6% ×1 implies−7.6%AMZD returned−10.2%
AMZZ5.9 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AMZN +7.6% ×2 implies+15.3%AMZZ returned+9.4%AMZN +7.6% ×2 implies+15.3%AMZZ returned+9.4%

Performance, window by window

AMZD and AMZZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AMZDAMZZAMZDAMZZAMZDAMZZ
1 month+3.9%−8.5%+3.9%−7.9%0.0 pts−0.7 pts
3 months−10.2%+9.4%−7.6%+15.3%−2.5 pts−5.9 pts
6 months−22.4%+37.9%−23.6%+47.3%+1.2 pts−9.4 pts
1 year−15.5%+4.0%−11.7%+23.3%−3.8 pts−19.4 pts
3 years−50.4%not published−81.8%not published+31.4 ptsnot published
Since launch−58.4%+36.6%−98.3%+94.3%+39.9 pts−57.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AMZD and AMZZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMZD
Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Amazon.com (AMZN)
IssuerDirexionGraniteShares
Sets out to return-1x+2x
OnAMZNAMZN
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−10.2%+9.4%
Underlying returned, 3 months+7.6%+7.6%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−7.6%+15.3%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.5 pts−5.9 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−15.5%+4.0%
Difference from stated, over that window−3.8 pts−19.4 pts
Underlying volatility44%44%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−0.7 pts
Expense rationot published1.15%
LaunchedSep 7, 2022Mar 18, 2024

AMZD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMZD returned −10.2% where its own daily promise gave −11.4%, 1.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AMZN's 7.6% implies −7.6%, which makes AMZD look 2.5 points short. 3.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZD aims to return -1 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMZN moved at 44% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

AMZZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMZZ returned +9.4% where its own daily promise gave +11.2%, 1.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMZN's 7.6% implies +15.3%, which makes AMZZ look 5.9 points short. 4.1 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMZZ aims to return +2 times AMZN's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AMZD or AMZZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMZD finished 2.5 points from what its multiple implies and AMZZ finished 5.9 points from its own, so AMZD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AMZD and AMZZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Amazon.com, AMZD at -1 times and AMZZ at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AMZD or AMZZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AMZD’s moved at 44% annualized and AMZZ’s at 44%, so AMZD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AMZD or AMZZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AMZD against AMZZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMZD against AMZZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AMZD-AMZZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources