Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

AMDG vs DAMD: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, AMDG finished 3.4 points short and DAMD 0.2 points short.

Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−13.0%AMDG returned, 3 months
−32.5%DAMD returned, 3 months
−14.8 ptsAMDG from its stated multiple
−30.7 ptsDAMD from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: AMDG scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

AMDG 32.6DAMD 15.30.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

AMDG14.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AMD +0.9% ×2 implies+1.8%AMDG returned−13.0%AMD +0.9% ×2 implies+1.8%AMDG returned−13.0%
DAMD30.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
AMD +0.9% ×2 implies−1.8%DAMD returned−32.5%AMD +0.9% ×2 implies−1.8%DAMD returned−32.5%

Performance, window by window

AMDG and DAMD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
AMDGDAMDAMDGDAMDAMDGDAMD
1 month+10.3%−17.4%+13.7%−13.7%−3.4 pts−3.6 pts
3 months−13.0%−32.5%+1.8%−1.8%−14.8 pts−30.7 pts
6 months+413.8%−94.3%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
1 year+493.0%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch+626.9%−93.4%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
AMDG and DAMD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of AMD
DAMD
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short AMD ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of AMD
IssuerLeverage SharesDefiance
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnAMDAMD
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−13.0%−32.5%
Underlying returned, 3 months+0.9%+0.9%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+1.8%−1.8%
Difference from stated, 3 months−14.8 pts−30.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch+493.0%−93.4%
Difference from stated, over that windownot availablenot available
Underlying volatility70%70%
Difference over the days both have traded−3.4 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.78%1.30%
LaunchedJan 24, 2025Nov 14, 2025

AMDG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: AMDG returned −13.0% where its own daily promise gave −9.6%, 3.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times AMD's 0.9% implies +1.8%, which makes AMDG look 14.8 points short. 11.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AMDG aims to return +2 times AMD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AMD moved at 70% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

DAMD in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: DAMD returned −32.5% where its own daily promise gave −32.3%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times AMD's 0.9% implies −1.8%, which makes DAMD look 30.7 points short. 30.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DAMD aims to return -2 times AMD's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, AMDG or DAMD?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, AMDG finished 14.8 points from what its multiple implies and DAMD finished 30.7 points from its own, so AMDG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are AMDG and DAMD levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on AMD, AMDG at +2 times and DAMD at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, AMDG or DAMD?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AMDG’s moved at 70% annualized and DAMD’s at 70%, so AMDG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold AMDG or DAMD for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, AMDG or DAMD?
AMDG charges 0.78% a year and DAMD charges 1.30%, so AMDG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AMDG against DAMD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AMDG against DAMD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/AMDG-DAMD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources